This film documents how the USA has betrayed its founding ideals in 2015-2025…
Ricochet
- Description
- Reviews
- Citation
- Cataloging
- Transcript
RICOCHET is a documentary feature film about the trial of an undocumented immigrant, Jose Inés Garcia Zaraté, for the accidental shooting of a young woman, Kate Steinle on Pier 14 in San Francisco in July of 2015. The incident gains national attention when Donald Trump exploits this on the campaign trail for the anti-immigration movement that he rides to the Republican nomination and eventually, the White House. At the same time, the national media takes the story and makes it a referendum on San Francisco’s sanctuary city policy. So the stakes are high when the trial finally begins in fall 2017, with the defense led by two San Francisco public defenders: Chief Attorney Matt Gonzalez and Francisco Ugarte, head of the office’s Immigration Defense Unit.
"The beauty of Ricochet is in its showing in painstaking detail how, stripped of its racist accoutrements, the Steinle death can be understood as the product of a confluence of freak occurrences." —Peter Wong, BeyondChron
"Their story is so heartbreaking, but the fact that it was used as an anti-immigrant stance, as opposed to an anti-gun stance is shows to me the power structures that are alive." —Miko Lee, co-host, Apex Express
Citation
Main credits
Adachi, Jeff (film director)
Adachi, Jeff (film producer)
Wimbush, Chihiro (film director)
Wimbush, Chihiro (film producer)
Wimbush, Chihiro (editor of moving image work)
Chu, Jenny (director of photography)
Choi, Jim (director of photography)
Other credits
Editor, Chihiro Wimbush; director of photography, Jenny Chu, Jim Choi.
Distributor subjects
Social Justice; Criminal Justice; Law & Legal Studies; Immigration; Immigrant Rights; Latinx Studies; Political Science; Media Studies; Gun Control; Forensics; Human RightsKeywords
WEBVTT
00:00:02.252 --> 00:00:04.744
[dramatic music]
00:00:42.949 --> 00:00:45.524
[dark music]
00:01:02.471 --> 00:01:04.060
(911 Operator #1)
San Francisco 911, what\'s the location
00:01:04.060 --> 00:01:05.310
of your emergency?
00:01:05.310 --> 00:01:07.228
(Caller #1) Pier 14 next to
Embarcadero ferry building.
00:01:07.228 --> 00:01:08.719
(Caller #2)
There\'s a lady that collapsed.
00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:11.282
(Caller #3)
Somebody is down on the pier.
00:01:11.282 --> 00:01:15.215
We need medical and police
assistance immediately.
00:01:15.215 --> 00:01:16.048
(Caller #1)
There was a big explosion
00:01:16.048 --> 00:01:16.881
I\'m not really sure what happened
00:01:16.881 --> 00:01:19.089
but she\'s on the ground right now.
00:01:19.089 --> 00:01:20.725
There are people around
her, and she\'s limp,
00:01:20.725 --> 00:01:21.558
her body is limp.
00:01:21.558 --> 00:01:22.960
(Caller #4)
Someone just got shot here.
00:01:22.960 --> 00:01:25.093
(911 Operator #1)
You see the person with the gun?
00:01:26.240 --> 00:01:28.020
(Caller #4)
Yeah, the guy just ran away.
00:01:28.020 --> 00:01:29.912
(911 Operator #1)
What race was he?
00:01:29.912 --> 00:01:31.630
(Caller #4)
African-American person.
00:01:31.630 --> 00:01:33.747
(Police Officer)
We got one victim, it\'s a female,
00:01:33.747 --> 00:01:37.488
GSW to the back, it\'s
going to be a 31-year old.
00:01:38.540 --> 00:01:40.300
(911 Operator #2)
911.
00:01:40.300 --> 00:01:41.841
(Female Caller)
Yeah, I just got a phone call.
00:01:41.841 --> 00:01:44.200
My sister was hurt on Pier 14.
00:01:44.200 --> 00:01:46.770
(911 Operator #2)
Who did you get the information from?
00:01:46.770 --> 00:01:50.255
(Female Caller)
Well, my dad called us hysterical.
00:01:50.255 --> 00:01:52.590
(911 Operator #2)
And what is your sister\'s name?
00:01:52.590 --> 00:01:55.423
(Female Caller)
Katherine Steinle.
00:02:03.644 --> 00:02:05.061
- What\'s up, man?
00:02:06.429 --> 00:02:07.617
Hey, how are you?
00:02:07.617 --> 00:02:09.198
- I\'m fine.
- You\'re good?
00:02:09.198 --> 00:02:10.031
- Yes.
00:02:10.031 --> 00:02:12.851
- Okay, you speak English, right? You do?
00:02:12.851 --> 00:02:14.290
Is that a yes? I\'m sorry.
00:02:14.290 --> 00:02:15.123
- Yeah.
00:02:16.006 --> 00:02:18.081
- So, this is Officer Covarrubias.
00:02:18.081 --> 00:02:19.037
He speaks Spanish.
00:02:19.037 --> 00:02:21.471
- [speaks in Spanish]
- No.
00:02:21.471 --> 00:02:22.890
(Newscaster)
Now facing murder charges,
00:02:22.890 --> 00:02:25.790
undocumented immigrant Juan
Francisco Lopez Sanchez
00:02:25.790 --> 00:02:28.290
told a judge, he was not
guilty in the killing
00:02:28.290 --> 00:02:30.400
of 32-year old, Kate Steinle.
00:02:30.400 --> 00:02:31.810
Even with a Spanish translator,
00:02:31.810 --> 00:02:34.660
he didn\'t seem to understand
what was going on in court,
00:02:34.660 --> 00:02:37.323
and answered the judge\'s
questions about court dates
00:02:37.323 --> 00:02:40.945
with the same answer,
\"Not guilty\" in Spanish.
00:02:40.945 --> 00:02:42.230
[speaks in Spanish]
00:02:42.230 --> 00:02:44.970
- All children are
special in their own way,
00:02:44.970 --> 00:02:48.370
and Kate was special in the
way she connected with people.
00:02:48.370 --> 00:02:49.820
We called it the Kate effect.
00:02:51.120 --> 00:02:55.260
Kate was beautiful, kind, happy,
00:02:55.260 --> 00:02:58.683
caring, loving, deep in faith.
00:02:59.940 --> 00:03:04.410
Kate had a special soul,
a kind and giving heart,
00:03:04.410 --> 00:03:06.260
the most contagious laugh,
00:03:06.260 --> 00:03:08.650
and a smile that would light up a room.
00:03:08.650 --> 00:03:10.890
We were walking arm-in-arm on Pier 14
00:03:10.890 --> 00:03:14.613
in San Francisco, enjoying
a wonderful day together.
00:03:15.840 --> 00:03:19.193
Suddenly, a shot rang out, Kate fell,
00:03:20.653 --> 00:03:24.488
and looked at me and said, \"Help me, Dad.\"
00:03:24.488 --> 00:03:26.510
- The plan was, they were going
to come back to Pleasanton.
00:03:26.510 --> 00:03:29.668
My sister was gonna spend the
night, and the following day,
00:03:29.668 --> 00:03:32.894
we were planning on having
a gender revealing party
00:03:32.894 --> 00:03:37.093
for our baby girl.
00:03:38.620 --> 00:03:40.670
No father should hold their daughter
00:03:40.670 --> 00:03:42.370
while they take their last breath.
00:03:46.020 --> 00:03:48.111
(Man)
Did you shoot Kate Steinle,
00:03:48.111 --> 00:03:51.070
the lady who was down on Pier 14?
00:03:51.070 --> 00:03:52.216
- Yes.
00:03:52.216 --> 00:03:53.700
(Man)
You did shoot her?
00:03:53.700 --> 00:03:55.210
- Mm-hmm.
00:03:55.210 --> 00:03:57.043
(Man)
Why did you do that?
00:03:58.850 --> 00:04:03.850
- Kate Steinle, gunned
down in the sanctuary city
00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:09.283
of San Francisco by an illegal immigrant,
00:04:10.330 --> 00:04:14.542
deported five previous times,
00:04:14.542 --> 00:04:18.166
and they knew he was no good.
[audience applauding]
00:04:18.166 --> 00:04:21.491
[audience chanting]
Build that wall, build that wall,
00:04:21.491 --> 00:04:24.524
[audience chanting]
build that wall, build that wall,
00:04:24.524 --> 00:04:27.497
[audience chanting]
build that wall, build that wall...
00:04:42.063 --> 00:04:42.896
- Thank you, sir.
00:04:42.896 --> 00:04:46.803
[people chattering]
00:04:46.803 --> 00:04:47.636
(Reporter #1)
What\'s the goal?
00:04:47.636 --> 00:04:51.778
- Well, we\'re trying to tell
Mr. García Zaraté\'s story,
00:04:51.778 --> 00:04:54.490
and we\'re hoping to be
able to do it effectively.
00:04:54.490 --> 00:04:55.922
(Reporter #2)
What is his story?
00:04:55.922 --> 00:04:59.170
- Well, as you know, I
think, from the very outset,
00:04:59.170 --> 00:05:01.940
I said that this very well
could be an accidental shooting.
00:05:01.940 --> 00:05:03.760
- Today is about the Steinle family,
00:05:03.760 --> 00:05:06.030
and the incredible resolve they\'ve shown
00:05:06.030 --> 00:05:08.750
through the entire process.
00:05:08.750 --> 00:05:10.510
And we\'re going to do
everything we can to bring
00:05:10.510 --> 00:05:11.600
this family justice.
00:05:11.600 --> 00:05:13.171
(Reporter #3)
Do you agree he bears some responsibility
00:05:13.171 --> 00:05:15.260
even if you argue that it was accidental?
00:05:15.260 --> 00:05:18.614
- No, you don\'t bear
responsibility in terms of
00:05:18.614 --> 00:05:22.430
the criminal law as a criminal sanction,
00:05:22.430 --> 00:05:24.640
whether or not he\'s committed a crime.
00:05:24.640 --> 00:05:27.780
If he didn\'t know that the
object he touched had a gun
00:05:27.780 --> 00:05:31.430
in it, then he does not bear
criminal responsibility.
00:05:31.430 --> 00:05:34.020
- There\'s gonna be a baseline
question that the jury
00:05:34.020 --> 00:05:36.900
is going to answer, and that question is
00:05:36.900 --> 00:05:39.890
whether the defendant
intended to fire that gun.
00:05:39.890 --> 00:05:40.770
- The trial is starting.
00:05:40.770 --> 00:05:43.410
I mean, we\'re giving them
our version of events.
00:05:43.410 --> 00:05:45.780
I\'m looking forward to
hearing what the prosecutor
00:05:45.780 --> 00:05:47.540
says about the same evidence.
00:05:47.540 --> 00:05:51.560
- So, the charge is murder,
and in this particular context,
00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:53.024
it\'s in the second degree.
00:05:53.024 --> 00:05:54.428
- All right, thanks.
00:05:54.428 --> 00:05:59.330
As somebody that grew up
on the Mexico-Texas border,
00:05:59.330 --> 00:06:03.690
I see someone like García
Zaraté, and I see a guy
00:06:03.690 --> 00:06:05.670
that\'s coming to try to improve his life.
00:06:05.670 --> 00:06:07.840
I mean, he\'s trying to come to get work,
00:06:07.840 --> 00:06:12.840
offering his labor for an
embarrassingly low price.
00:06:13.640 --> 00:06:18.120
We very much like illegal immigration
00:06:18.120 --> 00:06:21.200
when we need the crops to be picked,
00:06:21.200 --> 00:06:23.740
we need someone to cook
our food at the restaurant,
00:06:23.740 --> 00:06:26.500
when we need someone to
take care of our kids.
00:06:26.500 --> 00:06:28.940
But in the off season,
00:06:28.940 --> 00:06:32.450
we are happy to push those individuals
00:06:32.450 --> 00:06:34.050
into our prison system for being
00:06:34.050 --> 00:06:36.370
here without documentation.
00:06:36.370 --> 00:06:40.040
So, it\'s a real
schizophrenia in our country,
00:06:40.040 --> 00:06:42.827
and I think we\'re trying to
grapple with it right now.
00:06:42.827 --> 00:06:44.633
- I know, and we\'re not
letting people in yet, okay?
00:06:44.633 --> 00:06:45.933
- (Woman)
Oh, I\'m sorry.
00:06:45.933 --> 00:06:48.119
- But these people, who are these people?
00:06:48.119 --> 00:06:51.740
- You have to push the
system as hard as you can
00:06:51.740 --> 00:06:54.260
to ensure people are fairly treated.
00:06:54.260 --> 00:06:58.370
I saw this case as vital to our fight
00:06:58.370 --> 00:07:02.000
for fundamental dignity in
human rights and social justice.
00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:04.060
- Why? Why did you shoot the gun?
00:07:04.060 --> 00:07:04.923
- Why that girl?
00:07:06.895 --> 00:07:08.278
- I don\'t no remember.
00:07:08.278 --> 00:07:09.394
- What did she do to you?
00:07:09.394 --> 00:07:13.353
- You do remember! You do remember.
00:07:13.353 --> 00:07:16.500
- I see three pictures,
the same in the paper
00:07:16.500 --> 00:07:19.260
- (shouting) WHY DID YOU SHOOT THAT GIRL?
00:07:20.661 --> 00:07:22.510
- I don\'t no remember.
00:07:22.510 --> 00:07:24.200
- You don\'t remember?
- You\'re a liar.
00:07:24.200 --> 00:07:25.680
- Because the whole day-
00:07:25.680 --> 00:07:27.060
- No, you were not sleeping.
00:07:27.060 --> 00:07:30.180
You were on the pier, 10
feet away from that girl,
00:07:30.180 --> 00:07:32.660
when she\'s walking with family,
00:07:32.660 --> 00:07:34.222
and you put a bullet through her back.
00:07:34.222 --> 00:07:35.738
(Newscaster)
It was a random encounter,
00:07:35.738 --> 00:07:38.210
but the details have sparked
a political firestorm
00:07:38.210 --> 00:07:41.310
because Lopez Sanchez was
an undocumented immigrant,
00:07:41.310 --> 00:07:43.470
allowed out of jail just three months ago,
00:07:43.470 --> 00:07:46.010
even after his record
showed several felony
00:07:46.010 --> 00:07:49.530
convictions and five
deportations to Mexico.
00:07:49.530 --> 00:07:51.987
As a so-called sanctuary
city, San Francisco said,
00:07:51.987 --> 00:07:54.410
\"It was following its
own policy that prevents
00:07:54.410 --> 00:07:56.990
it from holding non-violent
offenders for immigration
00:07:56.990 --> 00:08:00.370
and customs enforcement,
unless it has a court order.\"
00:08:00.370 --> 00:08:03.990
- The essence of a sanctuary
policy is that a city
00:08:03.990 --> 00:08:08.620
or locality will not elect
to use its own tax dollars
00:08:08.620 --> 00:08:12.670
to support federal
immigration enforcement.
00:08:12.670 --> 00:08:16.820
In San Francisco, we have 40%
of our city as foreign born.
00:08:16.820 --> 00:08:19.120
We\'ve always had many undocumented people
00:08:19.120 --> 00:08:21.850
in our community that
are critical components
00:08:21.850 --> 00:08:23.290
of our community.
00:08:23.290 --> 00:08:27.360
And sanctuary policy is this
policy of non-engagement,
00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:30.540
is a product of recognition of who we are,
00:08:30.540 --> 00:08:33.140
it\'s recognizing the
humanity of who we are.
00:08:33.140 --> 00:08:37.200
We don\'t want mothers
not going to the hospital
00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:39.250
for fear of deportation.
00:08:39.250 --> 00:08:41.830
And we don\'t want victims
of crimes to be afraid
00:08:41.830 --> 00:08:42.950
of reporting to the police,
00:08:42.950 --> 00:08:45.520
that\'s what a sanctuary policy is.
00:08:45.520 --> 00:08:49.670
Mr. García Zaraté, prior
to coming to San Francisco,
00:08:49.670 --> 00:08:51.640
was in the arms of the federal government.
00:08:51.640 --> 00:08:55.550
He had just spent six
years in federal prison
00:08:55.550 --> 00:08:59.070
for illegal re-entry.
Illegal reentry is a crime.
00:08:59.070 --> 00:09:02.530
It\'s the act of walking across the border.
00:09:02.530 --> 00:09:04.850
- This individual who
is set to be deported
00:09:04.850 --> 00:09:08.140
in a different city was
brought back on a 20-year-old
00:09:08.140 --> 00:09:09.840
marijuana possession charge,
00:09:09.840 --> 00:09:11.760
which no law enforcement
person in the city
00:09:11.760 --> 00:09:15.720
of San Francisco right
now would prosecute.
00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:20.710
- We cannot allow one
event to dictate 25 years,
00:09:20.710 --> 00:09:23.150
25 years of our city\'s policies
00:09:23.150 --> 00:09:25.590
towards undocumented
immigrants in our city.
00:09:25.590 --> 00:09:27.370
[people applauding]
00:09:27.370 --> 00:09:29.360
- It\'s remarkable that
this case somehow became
00:09:29.360 --> 00:09:31.890
about sanctuary city \'cause
this case has nothing
00:09:31.890 --> 00:09:33.000
to do with sanctuary city.
00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:36.450
What we found out about
the case is that it didn\'t
00:09:36.450 --> 00:09:38.123
fit this narrative.
00:09:40.180 --> 00:09:42.263
[camera shutter clicks]
00:09:47.479 --> 00:09:52.229
- It was a day like
today, sunny, inviting.
00:09:53.400 --> 00:09:54.870
I was walking on the pier,
00:09:54.870 --> 00:09:57.310
and I walked to the end of the pier,
00:09:57.310 --> 00:09:59.670
took some pictures of some
fishermen and walked back.
00:09:59.670 --> 00:10:01.320
And I noticed a man on the pier.
00:10:01.320 --> 00:10:04.560
He had a blanket over his shoulders.
00:10:04.560 --> 00:10:07.220
He seemed a little bit lost,
00:10:07.220 --> 00:10:10.741
and I was drawn to that
because I thought he needed
00:10:10.741 --> 00:10:13.253
some help and maybe some attention.
00:10:15.890 --> 00:10:19.700
So, I asked him if I could
take pictures of him.
00:10:19.700 --> 00:10:24.680
What is in the pictures
is someone who was poor,
00:10:24.680 --> 00:10:28.220
who needed help, to connect with,
00:10:28.220 --> 00:10:29.753
because he was a human being.
00:10:32.340 --> 00:10:35.190
- When I see an event that
might tell us something
00:10:35.190 --> 00:10:39.460
about this time, and if I can
make it there, I try to go.
00:10:39.460 --> 00:10:42.423
So, I was there when the trial began.
00:10:44.300 --> 00:10:46.640
I don\'t think I\'ve ever
been in a courtroom
00:10:46.640 --> 00:10:48.020
with that high stakes,
00:10:48.020 --> 00:10:50.570
where so much national
attention was focused on it.
00:10:51.936 --> 00:10:54.686
[dramatic music]
00:11:07.830 --> 00:11:12.300
- The story that I felt
was told by the prosecution
00:11:12.300 --> 00:11:15.910
was that Mr. García Zaraté
either stole this gun or got
00:11:15.910 --> 00:11:18.450
it from somebody who did,
walked out to the pier
00:11:18.450 --> 00:11:22.547
that day and then pointed
the gun in the direction
00:11:22.547 --> 00:11:26.293
of Ms. Steinle, and fired intentionally,
00:11:27.290 --> 00:11:32.013
wanting to kill her or
wanting to kill someone.
00:11:37.066 --> 00:11:40.120
[people chattering]
00:11:40.120 --> 00:11:42.100
(Dave Eggers)
Diana Garcia, the prosecutor,
00:11:42.100 --> 00:11:45.620
gets up and she gives
her summary of the case.
00:11:45.620 --> 00:11:49.660
She created what seemed
like an airtight narrative,
00:11:49.660 --> 00:11:53.910
where of course, he was
scoping this pier out,
00:11:53.910 --> 00:11:55.820
trying to pick a target at random,
00:11:55.820 --> 00:11:57.560
but he had evil on his mind,
00:11:57.560 --> 00:12:01.060
and he saw Kate Steinle
and thought, she\'s the one.
00:12:01.060 --> 00:12:04.770
And between photos that
you saw and the video
00:12:04.770 --> 00:12:06.268
and everything else,
it really seemed like,
00:12:06.268 --> 00:12:10.940
well my God, there\'s no
way to escape that verdict.
00:12:10.940 --> 00:12:13.230
- There were a lot of
conclusory statements
00:12:13.230 --> 00:12:15.470
that she made that are simply not true.
00:12:15.470 --> 00:12:18.710
And I will lay it out. It\'s gonna be...
00:12:18.710 --> 00:12:21.878
You\'re gonna hear the
defense case this afternoon,
00:12:21.878 --> 00:12:25.010
and we will address every point from them,
00:12:25.010 --> 00:12:26.282
so keep an open mind.
00:12:26.282 --> 00:12:29.641
- The facts that she relied
upon particularly at the end,
00:12:29.641 --> 00:12:32.010
you know, just didn\'t add up.
00:12:32.010 --> 00:12:35.048
They have to prove that he
intended to kill somebody.
00:12:35.048 --> 00:12:38.570
- If he does not know
the nature of the object,
00:12:38.570 --> 00:12:40.820
when you start saying,
well, did he act reasonably?
00:12:40.820 --> 00:12:45.140
Is there a standard of
care that you would expect?
00:12:45.140 --> 00:12:47.840
I think, the takeaway is,
00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:50.644
you can\'t blame him for
something that\'s a pure accident.
00:12:50.644 --> 00:12:52.531
- How did you get the gun?
00:12:52.531 --> 00:12:56.458
[speaks in Spanish]
00:12:56.458 --> 00:12:57.933
- [translating] When I got there.
00:12:57.933 --> 00:13:02.932
[speaks in Spanish]
00:13:13.491 --> 00:13:14.683
- The gun was on the pier?
00:13:15.700 --> 00:13:17.216
[speaks in Spanish]
00:13:18.155 --> 00:13:18.988
- [translating] Yes.
00:13:18.988 --> 00:13:20.760
- There were a few times,
00:13:20.760 --> 00:13:22.760
when the defendant answers questions
00:13:22.760 --> 00:13:25.970
for the cops, repeatedly.
00:13:25.970 --> 00:13:29.570
They don\'t believe the answer, and they,
00:13:29.570 --> 00:13:31.270
I won\'t say trick him,
00:13:31.270 --> 00:13:34.270
but they\'re able to get
him to answer differently.
00:13:34.270 --> 00:13:35.774
- You didn\'t step on the gun, did you?
00:13:35.774 --> 00:13:37.999
[speaks in Spanish]
00:13:44.470 --> 00:13:45.570
- [translating] Yes.
00:13:45.570 --> 00:13:47.508
- You pulled the trigger, correct?
00:13:47.508 --> 00:13:51.516
[speaks in Spanish]
00:13:52.840 --> 00:13:53.673
Just once.
00:13:53.673 --> 00:13:55.564
[speaks in Spanish]
00:13:57.180 --> 00:13:58.013
Yeah.
00:13:58.013 --> 00:14:02.152
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:02.152 --> 00:14:04.558
- [translating] Yes.
- So you pulled the trigger just once.
00:14:04.558 --> 00:14:07.626
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:07.626 --> 00:14:08.849
You were sitting down.
00:14:08.849 --> 00:14:10.520
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:10.520 --> 00:14:11.363
Correct?
00:14:11.363 --> 00:14:14.770
- [speaks in Spanish]
- Mmm-hmm.
00:14:14.770 --> 00:14:18.141
And the girl was five feet away from you.
00:14:18.141 --> 00:14:23.090
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:23.090 --> 00:14:25.032
About where Tony is.
00:14:25.032 --> 00:14:28.420
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:28.420 --> 00:14:29.580
- And later they circle back,
00:14:29.580 --> 00:14:31.740
we don\'t believe you
got the gun on the pier.
00:14:31.740 --> 00:14:33.564
- I believe he found it.
00:14:33.564 --> 00:14:35.270
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:35.270 --> 00:14:37.963
But I don\'t believe you
found it on the dock.
00:14:37.963 --> 00:14:39.988
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:41.673
- Is that correct?
00:14:41.673 --> 00:14:42.506
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:44.906 --> 00:14:46.258
- Mmm-hmm
- (translating) Yes.
00:14:46.258 --> 00:14:48.400
- So you got it somewhere other
than the pier, didn\'t you?
00:14:48.400 --> 00:14:50.584
Yes. Where\'d you get it?
00:14:50.584 --> 00:14:52.917
Right there, right there at the scene.
00:14:52.917 --> 00:14:54.498
- Where did he find the gun?
00:14:54.498 --> 00:14:59.140
[speaks in Spanish]
00:14:59.140 --> 00:15:00.513
- [translating] That\'s
where I was sitting down.
00:15:00.513 --> 00:15:02.680
[speaks in Spanish]
- [translating] That\'s where I found it.
00:15:02.680 --> 00:15:05.430
- It\'s just so apparent
00:15:05.430 --> 00:15:08.270
that the guy comes back to his story.
00:15:08.270 --> 00:15:11.650
- I think it\'s a really nice
setup for you to come in now.
00:15:11.650 --> 00:15:16.650
- Gonzalez got up and
started very haltingly.
00:15:16.830 --> 00:15:19.610
He got off to a shaky
start, and I thought,
00:15:19.610 --> 00:15:21.683
okay, well, this is over.
00:15:22.690 --> 00:15:26.230
But then he got going, in a
way that he\'s soft-spoken,
00:15:26.230 --> 00:15:29.800
in a way is not at all domineering,
00:15:29.800 --> 00:15:32.990
but you could hear him just
enough to hear him very calmly,
00:15:32.990 --> 00:15:35.580
break it down bit by bit,
00:15:35.580 --> 00:15:38.180
and why every piece of evidence presented
00:15:38.180 --> 00:15:41.010
by Garcia was flawed.
00:15:41.010 --> 00:15:45.800
And then of course,
culminating in the ricochet.
00:15:45.800 --> 00:15:47.360
(Newscaster)
It was the medical examiner\'s
00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:49.480
autopsy report that found that the bullet
00:15:49.480 --> 00:15:52.380
must have ricocheted.
The bullet was deformed,
00:15:52.380 --> 00:15:55.900
and Steinle\'s gunshot wound was abnormal.
00:15:55.900 --> 00:15:58.350
The ricochet marks on
the pavement were not
00:15:58.350 --> 00:16:00.500
where they suspected near her body.
00:16:00.500 --> 00:16:04.290
- When we found out this was a ricochet,
00:16:04.290 --> 00:16:07.220
it was a remarkable turning point,
00:16:07.220 --> 00:16:10.494
and a very moving experience
\'cause we knew at that moment
00:16:10.494 --> 00:16:11.977
that our client was innocent.
00:16:18.830 --> 00:16:21.293
- This is the chair
that he was sitting in.
00:16:23.810 --> 00:16:27.080
So what we think happened
and what our client told
00:16:27.080 --> 00:16:30.060
the police consistently in
the police interrogation
00:16:30.060 --> 00:16:35.060
is that he felt a bundle on
the ground with his foot.
00:16:36.010 --> 00:16:39.470
And when he reached
down to investigate it,
00:16:39.470 --> 00:16:42.981
the gun went off and he
immediately just threw
00:16:42.981 --> 00:16:46.553
it and got up and walked away.
00:16:46.553 --> 00:16:50.010
There\'s video of the pier from that day
00:16:50.010 --> 00:16:52.490
that captures the incident.
00:16:52.490 --> 00:16:56.008
And the video is from
00:16:56.008 --> 00:16:58.522
that pier over there,
00:16:58.522 --> 00:17:02.100
where you see the San
Francisco Fire Department boat,
00:17:02.100 --> 00:17:04.737
they have a camera
mounted on the firehouse
00:17:04.737 --> 00:17:06.140
pointed this way.
00:17:06.140 --> 00:17:10.520
And it\'s a little over 1,000
feet from here, I believe.
00:17:10.520 --> 00:17:14.390
Our client was seated
in this seat right here,
00:17:14.390 --> 00:17:18.580
which is 13.9 feet from the ricochet,
00:17:18.580 --> 00:17:22.690
and Kate Steinle was standing
at the railing down there,
00:17:22.690 --> 00:17:25.173
78 feet from the ricochet.
00:17:26.290 --> 00:17:28.707
[soft music]
00:17:37.450 --> 00:17:40.880
This is the approximate
location Kate Steinle was
00:17:40.880 --> 00:17:44.830
standing with her father
and their family friend
00:17:44.830 --> 00:17:48.220
when she was struck in
the back with a bullet.
00:18:25.870 --> 00:18:28.495
(Juror)
You first hear a gun\'s fired,
00:18:28.495 --> 00:18:30.445
it kills Miss Steinle,
00:18:30.445 --> 00:18:34.143
and you learn that there\'s a ricochet.
00:18:35.900 --> 00:18:38.010
It kind of begs the question.
00:18:38.010 --> 00:18:39.870
Did he mean to fire the gun, right?
00:18:39.870 --> 00:18:41.140
I mean, if you\'re trying to kill somebody,
00:18:41.140 --> 00:18:44.590
you usually aim at them
rather than 12 feet in front
00:18:44.590 --> 00:18:46.100
of you at the ground.
00:18:46.100 --> 00:18:50.230
- Mr. García Zaraté is seated
when the gun discharges.
00:18:50.230 --> 00:18:53.000
You know, that\'s a fact that
hasn\'t really come up a lot.
00:18:53.000 --> 00:18:54.730
I mean, if you shoot a gun,
00:18:54.730 --> 00:18:57.810
you\'re usually not sitting
down, you stand up.
00:18:57.810 --> 00:19:01.350
So, the prosecutor is trying
to concoct some theory
00:19:01.350 --> 00:19:05.260
that he was aiming a skip shot.
00:19:05.260 --> 00:19:08.380
- When she talked about the
skip shot, did you expect that?
00:19:08.380 --> 00:19:10.843
Has she said that before
that it\'s basically
00:19:10.843 --> 00:19:13.630
an intentional skip shot.
00:19:13.630 --> 00:19:16.200
In other words, if I\'m
trying to shoot you,
00:19:16.200 --> 00:19:18.760
I\'m gonna shoot the ground because I know
00:19:18.760 --> 00:19:20.450
that it\'s gonna skip shot.
00:19:20.450 --> 00:19:24.610
- Well, the skip shot theory
has one main challenge for us,
00:19:24.610 --> 00:19:29.610
which is there are three
points and only one of them
00:19:29.810 --> 00:19:32.154
is fixed, which is the one in the middle,
00:19:32.154 --> 00:19:35.070
where the muzzle of the gun was,
00:19:35.070 --> 00:19:37.600
and where Kate Steinle
was when she was hit,
00:19:37.600 --> 00:19:39.340
both can shift.
00:19:39.340 --> 00:19:41.300
And because of that, you can\'t make
00:19:41.300 --> 00:19:43.230
accurate trajectory analysis.
00:19:43.230 --> 00:19:46.490
So, you know, can you conceivably come up
00:19:46.490 --> 00:19:49.380
with a theory that it is a straight line,
00:19:49.380 --> 00:19:54.380
you could, except the
very nature of striking
00:19:54.640 --> 00:19:57.250
the concrete is gonna cause it to move.
00:19:57.250 --> 00:19:58.550
- We went out to the pier,
00:19:59.600 --> 00:20:01.340
and shot some video to take a look
00:20:01.340 --> 00:20:06.233
at where these objects
really were in space.
00:20:07.370 --> 00:20:09.303
We took a drone, we sent it up.
00:20:10.140 --> 00:20:12.660
This is a person sitting in the chair
00:20:13.830 --> 00:20:15.620
that the defendant was sitting in.
00:20:15.620 --> 00:20:20.620
This is a point where there
was a divot in the ground.
00:20:22.800 --> 00:20:24.270
We marked that with a roll of tape,
00:20:24.270 --> 00:20:26.760
so we\'d be able to see it from higher up.
00:20:26.760 --> 00:20:27.780
And when you look at the video,
00:20:27.780 --> 00:20:32.780
in terms of where it\'s cropped
from the DA\'s perspective.
00:20:32.920 --> 00:20:35.233
The area of focus is the chair,
00:20:36.620 --> 00:20:40.720
and roughly where the victim was standing
00:20:40.720 --> 00:20:41.833
along with her father.
00:20:44.930 --> 00:20:48.190
And I changed this to 12
feet on the newer version.
00:20:48.190 --> 00:20:53.190
- I think the problem
here is your bar here
00:20:53.740 --> 00:20:56.683
is to the left, it\'s not
really to the center.
00:20:59.230 --> 00:21:03.380
And if the seated person
has a gun in a right hand,
00:21:03.380 --> 00:21:06.010
it\'s gonna create more of a straight line.
00:21:06.010 --> 00:21:08.860
This could be a perfectly straight line,
00:21:08.860 --> 00:21:12.470
and it wouldn\'t mean that
he did it on purpose.
00:21:12.470 --> 00:21:16.550
And, but the one thing
that we know for certain
00:21:16.550 --> 00:21:19.820
is that the bullet
struck the ground first,
00:21:19.820 --> 00:21:22.650
which is why we believe it\'s consistent
00:21:22.650 --> 00:21:25.470
with there being some
movement of the bullet
00:21:25.470 --> 00:21:27.340
once it hits the ground.
00:21:27.340 --> 00:21:29.087
Nobody would imagine that the ricochet
00:21:29.087 --> 00:21:32.160
would be 80 feet away, you know,
00:21:32.160 --> 00:21:34.593
because it\'s such a freak accident.
00:21:35.820 --> 00:21:36.810
All right, let\'s keep going.
00:21:36.810 --> 00:21:38.610
Let\'s make some progress, it\'s late.
00:21:39.930 --> 00:21:44.600
- I have never seen a case
like this be considered murder.
00:21:44.600 --> 00:21:47.750
You can accidentally shoot
somebody, that happened here.
00:21:47.750 --> 00:21:51.040
But I mean, if you were trying
to actually shoot somebody,
00:21:51.040 --> 00:21:53.570
ricocheting a bullet off the
ground is not the way to do it.
00:21:53.570 --> 00:21:56.100
- So far, about 400,000 of you have signed
00:21:56.100 --> 00:21:58.640
a petition posted on www.billoreilly.com,
00:21:58.640 --> 00:22:01.160
that we will deliver to
the Senate and the House,
00:22:01.160 --> 00:22:03.990
asking for Congress to pass Kate\'s Law.
00:22:03.990 --> 00:22:08.870
That proposed law would mandate,
mandate that any illegal
00:22:08.870 --> 00:22:11.880
alien convicted of a felony
in the USA who comes back
00:22:11.880 --> 00:22:14.190
to this country after being deported,
00:22:14.190 --> 00:22:16.800
would serve a mandatory
five years in federal
00:22:16.800 --> 00:22:18.310
prison upon apprehension.
00:22:18.310 --> 00:22:20.160
So, I\'m talking to you over the weekend,
00:22:20.160 --> 00:22:22.390
Mr. Steinle, and you
indicated that you do support
00:22:22.390 --> 00:22:24.706
Kate\'s Law, why?
00:22:24.706 --> 00:22:29.071
- Well, I support Kate\'s
Law because it would be
00:22:29.071 --> 00:22:30.850
a legacy in her name,
00:22:30.850 --> 00:22:35.634
and her death would not go unnoticed.
00:22:35.634 --> 00:22:37.550
- We\'re doing it for her,
we\'re doing it for you,
00:22:37.550 --> 00:22:39.083
and we\'re doing it for all Americans.
00:22:40.906 --> 00:22:43.656
[dramatic music]
00:22:44.750 --> 00:22:47.500
(Donald Trump)
The US has become a dumping ground
00:22:50.450 --> 00:22:53.020
for everybody else\'s problems.
00:22:53.020 --> 00:22:55.750
And these aren\'t the best and the finest.
00:22:55.750 --> 00:22:58.060
When Mexico sends its people,
00:22:58.060 --> 00:23:00.270
they\'re not sending their best,
00:23:00.270 --> 00:23:04.050
they\'re sending people
that have lots of problems,
00:23:04.050 --> 00:23:06.250
and they\'re bringing
those problems with us.
00:23:07.680 --> 00:23:12.040
They\'re bringing drugs, they
bringing crime, they\'re rapists,
00:23:12.040 --> 00:23:14.730
and some, I assume, are good people.
00:23:14.730 --> 00:23:17.860
- I\'m always assuming that
there are layers and layers
00:23:17.860 --> 00:23:20.130
to the narrative that comes to be accepted
00:23:20.130 --> 00:23:21.350
in the public consciousness.
00:23:21.350 --> 00:23:25.180
And I remember very quickly just hearing
00:23:25.180 --> 00:23:28.810
from everybody that there
was this horrible man,
00:23:28.810 --> 00:23:32.320
this guy who had been
deported multiple times,
00:23:32.320 --> 00:23:36.520
he was this violent
homeless man who decided
00:23:36.520 --> 00:23:39.070
out of sheer evil to pick up a gun
00:23:39.070 --> 00:23:40.780
and shoot an innocent woman.
00:23:40.780 --> 00:23:44.720
- Where was the sanctuary
for Kate Steinle?
00:23:44.720 --> 00:23:46.700
- That was the prevailing narrative.
00:23:46.700 --> 00:23:51.260
And then when it became
politicized by Trump, if anything,
00:23:51.260 --> 00:23:55.130
I think that causes a lot
of people to look closer.
00:23:55.130 --> 00:23:57.600
I think, well, if he\'s using it,
00:23:57.600 --> 00:24:01.060
because so much of what he says is untrue,
00:24:01.060 --> 00:24:05.140
maybe there are subtleties to
this that have been untold.
00:24:05.140 --> 00:24:07.990
(Reporter)
You were deported many times,
00:24:07.990 --> 00:24:11.661
but kept returning back
to the United States.
00:24:11.661 --> 00:24:12.494
- Mm-hmm.
00:24:14.250 --> 00:24:16.949
- You\'ve been in jail before,
00:24:16.949 --> 00:24:20.436
why did you keep coming back to the US?
00:24:22.596 --> 00:24:27.421
- Because I\'m looking for
the job in the restaurant,
00:24:27.421 --> 00:24:30.721
or roofing, landscaping,
00:24:30.721 --> 00:24:33.637
or construction,
00:24:33.637 --> 00:24:36.050
for somebody that was over here.
00:24:36.050 --> 00:24:37.826
- So you were looking for work?
- Yeah.
00:24:37.826 --> 00:24:39.680
- Looking for a job?
- Yeah.
00:24:39.680 --> 00:24:40.513
- Okay.
00:24:42.483 --> 00:24:43.957
[sighs]
00:24:43.957 --> 00:24:46.140
- Welcome to the broadcast.
00:24:46.140 --> 00:24:48.380
We\'re joined now by
former mayoral candidate,
00:24:48.380 --> 00:24:50.370
Green Party candidate, former supervisor
00:24:50.370 --> 00:24:52.290
and attorney, Matt Gonzalez.
00:24:52.290 --> 00:24:55.810
How are you doing now in terms
of the political passion?
00:24:55.810 --> 00:24:57.540
Your political passions that made you run,
00:24:57.540 --> 00:24:59.100
and what do you do with them now?
00:24:59.100 --> 00:25:02.857
- Well, I don\'t think
that political activity
00:25:02.857 --> 00:25:05.856
is limited to electoral politics.
00:25:05.856 --> 00:25:09.106
And so, I\'m still engaged
in trying to effect ideas.
00:25:09.106 --> 00:25:10.906
(Newscaster)
Ralph Nader has picked the former
00:25:10.906 --> 00:25:13.200
San Francisco supervisor
to be his running mate.
00:25:13.200 --> 00:25:16.330
- It\'s not lost on me that
I\'m not a familiar face
00:25:16.330 --> 00:25:18.600
to the Washington press corps,
00:25:18.600 --> 00:25:22.240
so I\'m going to say a few
words about myself. I was born
00:25:22.240 --> 00:25:25.649
in McAllen, Texas, which is
in the Southern part of Texas.
00:25:25.649 --> 00:25:28.560
I served a decade as a public defender
00:25:28.560 --> 00:25:31.730
in San Francisco, and I have to say
00:25:31.730 --> 00:25:34.600
that it is an experience
that very much has
00:25:34.600 --> 00:25:36.600
informed my politics.
00:25:36.600 --> 00:25:40.130
And I have seen firsthand
over and over again,
00:25:40.130 --> 00:25:43.760
the realities and the result of the income
00:25:43.760 --> 00:25:46.157
inequalities that we have in our society.
00:25:46.157 --> 00:25:49.440
[audience clapping]
00:25:49.440 --> 00:25:51.830
We have a democracy that\'s in crisis.
00:25:51.830 --> 00:25:54.950
We have less people
turning out to the polls.
00:25:54.950 --> 00:25:59.600
We have wealth being held
by fewer and fewer people.
00:25:59.600 --> 00:26:02.250
We have over 2 million people in jails
00:26:02.250 --> 00:26:03.390
in the United States.
00:26:03.390 --> 00:26:06.398
- (Interviewer)
You pulled off one of the closest races
00:26:06.398 --> 00:26:08.801
with a huge disadvantage in many ways.
00:26:08.801 --> 00:26:11.510
- (Matt)
What I\'m proud of is having run a campaign
00:26:11.510 --> 00:26:16.510
that was unapologetic
about progressive ideas.
00:26:17.040 --> 00:26:19.690
And I think that that\'s
something to be proud of.
00:26:19.690 --> 00:26:22.140
I mean, we went out there
and we argued for things
00:26:22.140 --> 00:26:23.530
and if people didn\'t
like them, that\'s fine,
00:26:23.530 --> 00:26:26.070
vote against us, but there
wasn\'t any trickery involved.
00:26:26.070 --> 00:26:28.419
- (Interviewer)
As a Republican, I have total dismay
00:26:28.419 --> 00:26:31.536
at how successful you can be
through the courts, quietly.
00:26:31.536 --> 00:26:34.147
- Don\'t underestimate Matt Gonzalez.
00:26:35.225 --> 00:26:38.225
[people chattering]
00:26:41.900 --> 00:26:45.300
(Jeff) Matt Gonzalez is
thrilled to be defending a piece
00:26:45.300 --> 00:26:47.830
of human filth like this cockroach.
00:26:47.830 --> 00:26:50.330
Yes, outside of San Francisco,
he\'s considered a cockroach,
00:26:50.330 --> 00:26:52.543
a sub-human waste of DNA.
00:26:54.316 --> 00:26:55.910
- Yeah, that\'s just a little sample.
00:26:55.910 --> 00:26:57.010
Usually, I just delete them,
00:26:57.010 --> 00:26:59.127
but we\'re getting lots of fan mail.
00:26:59.127 --> 00:27:02.160
- I met with all the
chief public defenders
00:27:02.160 --> 00:27:04.650
around the state over the weekend.
00:27:04.650 --> 00:27:07.280
And they were telling me that they\'re all
00:27:07.280 --> 00:27:08.550
watching this case.
00:27:08.550 --> 00:27:09.487
- Really?
00:27:09.487 --> 00:27:10.430
- And, you know,
00:27:10.430 --> 00:27:15.430
so are the people in
government and their leaders,
00:27:15.432 --> 00:27:18.564
because finding out about
what really happened here,
00:27:18.564 --> 00:27:23.544
they think, is gonna have
an effect on how their
00:27:25.955 --> 00:27:28.697
county government sorta
treats sanctuary cities.
00:27:28.697 --> 00:27:30.440
\'Cause at some places, you know,
00:27:30.440 --> 00:27:32.882
they\'re talking about
revoking it or changing it.
00:27:32.882 --> 00:27:33.715
- Yeah.
00:27:33.715 --> 00:27:38.283
- It is a case that\'s gonna
have this reverberating effect.
00:27:38.283 --> 00:27:39.116
- Yeah.
00:27:39.116 --> 00:27:43.690
- And so far as our client,
Mr. Zaraté, is concerned,
00:27:43.690 --> 00:27:44.790
I mean, you know,
00:27:44.790 --> 00:27:47.873
our obligation is ensuring
that he\'ll get a fair trial.
00:27:49.800 --> 00:27:51.943
That\'s gonna be the challenge here.
00:27:51.943 --> 00:27:56.240
- I have absolutely no support
00:27:56.240 --> 00:27:58.131
for a city that ignores
00:27:58.131 --> 00:28:02.580
the strong evidence
that should be acted on.
00:28:02.580 --> 00:28:04.750
- Immigration is like a cheap drug.
00:28:04.750 --> 00:28:07.010
You get a big bang, a real quick high,
00:28:07.010 --> 00:28:08.561
and a very long hangover.
00:28:08.561 --> 00:28:09.394
- Well, it\'s not a quick high,
00:28:09.394 --> 00:28:10.597
when people are being
murdered in San Francisco.
00:28:10.597 --> 00:28:12.010
And if it\'s not a quick high,
00:28:12.010 --> 00:28:14.114
when people were escaping the prisons
00:28:14.114 --> 00:28:14.952
in Mexico-
00:28:14.952 --> 00:28:15.914
- It is the cheapest shot of all-
00:28:15.914 --> 00:28:17.262
- and selling heroin and
cocaine to our children -
00:28:17.262 --> 00:28:19.450
- To exploit the misery of that family-
00:28:19.450 --> 00:28:20.283
- It\'s not exploiting it.
00:28:20.283 --> 00:28:21.544
- It is exactly-
00:28:21.544 --> 00:28:22.784
- You\'re exploiting it by downplaying it.
00:28:22.784 --> 00:28:23.928
- It\'s nothing to do with immigration.
00:28:23.928 --> 00:28:26.340
- We\'re talking about illegal immigration.
00:28:26.340 --> 00:28:27.770
We\'re talking about crime.
00:28:27.770 --> 00:28:30.050
You saw what happened the
other day with the young lady
00:28:30.050 --> 00:28:32.270
in San Francisco, it\'s a disgrace.
00:28:32.270 --> 00:28:33.580
- (Newscaster)
The killing of 32-year old
00:28:33.580 --> 00:28:35.893
Kate Steinle, who was shot
in the back while walking
00:28:35.893 --> 00:28:39.300
with her father in San Francisco
was one of the centerpieces
00:28:39.300 --> 00:28:41.890
of Donald Trump\'s presidential campaign.
00:28:41.890 --> 00:28:44.570
The rallying cry for
building a wall and taking
00:28:44.570 --> 00:28:48.400
a tough stance on illegal
immigration and sanctuary cities.
00:28:48.400 --> 00:28:51.416
(Brad Steinle)
Donald Trump talks about Kate Steinle
00:28:51.416 --> 00:28:52.749
like he knows her.
00:28:52.749 --> 00:28:57.130
I\'ve never heard a word
from his campaign manager,
00:28:57.130 --> 00:28:59.950
never heard a word from him.
00:28:59.950 --> 00:29:04.120
It\'s disconcerting, and you know,
00:29:04.120 --> 00:29:06.480
I don\'t wanna be affiliated with somebody
00:29:06.480 --> 00:29:10.224
that can\'t have, doesn\'t have
a common courtesy to reach out
00:29:10.224 --> 00:29:13.320
and ask about Kate and
ask about our political
00:29:13.320 --> 00:29:14.894
views and what we want.
00:29:14.894 --> 00:29:19.853
The platform that he\'s setting
00:29:19.853 --> 00:29:23.620
isn\'t exactly what our family believes in.
00:29:23.620 --> 00:29:25.670
(Jim Steinle)
Unfortunately, due to disjointed laws
00:29:25.670 --> 00:29:27.833
and basic incompetence on many levels,
00:29:29.090 --> 00:29:32.520
the US has suffered a self-inflicted wound
00:29:32.520 --> 00:29:35.870
in the murder of our daughter
by the hand of a person
00:29:35.870 --> 00:29:39.570
that should have never been on
the streets of this country.
00:29:39.570 --> 00:29:42.270
I say this because the alleged murderer
00:29:42.270 --> 00:29:45.990
is an undocumented immigrant
who has been convicted
00:29:47.480 --> 00:29:49.680
of seven felonies in the US,
00:29:49.680 --> 00:29:52.230
and already deported five times.
00:29:52.230 --> 00:29:54.000
Yet, in March of this year,
00:29:54.000 --> 00:29:57.090
he was released from jail
and allowed to stay here
00:29:57.090 --> 00:29:59.993
freely because of those legal loopholes.
00:30:01.040 --> 00:30:04.960
Our family realize the
complexity of immigration laws,
00:30:04.960 --> 00:30:07.390
however, we feel strongly
that some legislation should
00:30:07.390 --> 00:30:11.800
be discussed, enacted, or changed to take
00:30:11.800 --> 00:30:13.720
these undocumented immigrant felons
00:30:13.720 --> 00:30:15.053
off our streets for good.
00:30:16.240 --> 00:30:19.490
We\'d be proud to see Kate\'s
name associated with some
00:30:19.490 --> 00:30:21.640
of this new legislation.
00:30:21.640 --> 00:30:26.400
We feel if Kate\'s Law saves
one daughter, one son,
00:30:26.400 --> 00:30:30.863
a mother, a father, Kate\'s
death won\'t be in vain.
00:30:32.418 --> 00:30:35.280
(Francisco)
This is this morning, CNN.
00:30:35.280 --> 00:30:37.357
It\'s like, they just don\'t get it.
00:30:37.357 --> 00:30:41.520
First minute and a half
is about sanctuary cities,
00:30:41.520 --> 00:30:43.780
about illegal immigration.
00:30:43.780 --> 00:30:47.600
- And you wouldn\'t expect
this from CNN, maybe Fox News.
00:30:47.600 --> 00:30:49.600
(Reporter) Zaraté, who was
homeless, and said he found
00:30:49.600 --> 00:30:50.433
the gun wrapped in a t-shirt-
00:30:50.433 --> 00:30:52.420
- It\'s unbelievable. It as if...
00:30:52.420 --> 00:30:54.170
- [Reporter] But claims
it was an accident.
00:30:54.170 --> 00:30:55.017
- The evidence...
00:30:55.017 --> 00:30:56.225
- [Reporter] Defense experts claiming,
00:30:56.225 --> 00:30:57.695
the bullet ricocheted on the ground.
00:30:57.695 --> 00:31:01.380
- Defense experts claiming
it was a ricochet.
00:31:01.380 --> 00:31:04.080
There\'s no, the prosecution brings it out
00:31:04.080 --> 00:31:06.702
then it\'s a ricochet.
- Yeah.
00:31:06.702 --> 00:31:09.759
Well, it\'s interesting
because they seem to cover
00:31:09.759 --> 00:31:13.210
the breadth of the case, but the narrative
00:31:13.210 --> 00:31:17.020
is that this is a trial over
sanctuary cities, right?
00:31:17.020 --> 00:31:18.719
- That\'s what the narrative is.
00:31:18.719 --> 00:31:21.282
- [Reporter] ...immigration
laws and sanctuary cities.
00:31:21.282 --> 00:31:24.224
- San Francisco\'s city
government is under fire tonight
00:31:24.224 --> 00:31:27.140
after the murder of a woman last week,
00:31:27.140 --> 00:31:29.350
allegedly by an illegal immigrant.
00:31:29.350 --> 00:31:31.890
- This local murder
case has attracted media
00:31:31.890 --> 00:31:33.680
from around the world.
00:31:33.680 --> 00:31:34.700
Because as you mentioned,
00:31:34.700 --> 00:31:36.570
the case has sparked a national debate
00:31:36.570 --> 00:31:39.710
over immigration and Sanctuary cities,
00:31:39.710 --> 00:31:42.020
and it remains politically explosive.
00:31:42.020 --> 00:31:43.490
(Newscaster)
The case that helped bring the term,
00:31:43.490 --> 00:31:45.750
sanctuary city, to the forefront.
00:31:45.750 --> 00:31:49.040
- It\'s hard to expect a fair trial
00:31:49.040 --> 00:31:52.210
when you have national media
so missing the coverage.
00:31:52.210 --> 00:31:53.153
I mean, they missed it.
00:31:53.153 --> 00:31:56.103
CNN, second or third day
00:31:56.103 --> 00:32:00.286
after the incident,
00:32:00.286 --> 00:32:02.950
said on a headline, \"García Zaraté comes
00:32:02.950 --> 00:32:07.100
to San Francisco because
of sanctuary city,\"
00:32:07.100 --> 00:32:08.560
which is like just a lie.
00:32:08.560 --> 00:32:10.340
He was brought here by the Feds.
00:32:10.340 --> 00:32:13.481
It\'s just, if anything
motivates you to go in
00:32:13.481 --> 00:32:14.864
and win this case, it\'s this.
00:32:15.839 --> 00:32:18.764
[gentle music]
00:32:33.320 --> 00:32:36.012
(Francisco)
My grandfather worked at the US Embassy
00:32:36.012 --> 00:32:38.550
in Madrid, during the Spanish Civil War,
00:32:38.550 --> 00:32:42.080
and he was opposed to the dictatorship.
00:32:42.080 --> 00:32:46.020
My great grandfather was in
the opposition government
00:32:46.020 --> 00:32:49.740
in Spain, and was sentenced
to death after the war.
00:32:49.740 --> 00:32:51.640
My grandfather was able to get a job
00:32:51.640 --> 00:32:56.280
at Dartmouth College as
a professor of Spanish.
00:32:56.280 --> 00:33:00.350
My father grew up in a
Spanish-speaking household
00:33:00.350 --> 00:33:02.600
in a very small town called
00:33:02.600 --> 00:33:05.300
Hanover, New Hampshire,
where he was really
00:33:05.300 --> 00:33:06.780
the only Spanish speaker,
00:33:06.780 --> 00:33:09.060
or maybe one or two in the entire town.
00:33:09.060 --> 00:33:11.460
And that was hard for him.
00:33:11.460 --> 00:33:13.890
He suffered a lot of discrimination.
00:33:13.890 --> 00:33:18.260
My mother\'s family, her grandfather,
00:33:18.260 --> 00:33:22.500
my great-grandfather, got on
a boat in Ireland and came
00:33:22.500 --> 00:33:24.110
to the United States because of poverty.
00:33:24.110 --> 00:33:25.920
He didn\'t have papers,
00:33:25.920 --> 00:33:28.630
got to New York, and
they processed him in.
00:33:28.630 --> 00:33:30.730
And that\'s how it was back in the day.
00:33:30.730 --> 00:33:32.820
He suffered also a lot of discrimination
00:33:33.700 --> 00:33:38.700
because he couldn\'t find
formal work as an Irish person.
00:33:39.240 --> 00:33:42.530
And so, in our history, both
my father\'s and mother\'s side,
00:33:42.530 --> 00:33:45.620
there\'s a recognition of
the importance of tolerance.
00:33:45.620 --> 00:33:48.183
And that\'s really been
part of my identity.
00:33:54.900 --> 00:33:57.750
(Jeff) Why do you think the
prosecution would want the jury
00:33:57.750 --> 00:34:01.420
to think that he was
relatively clear thinking?
00:34:01.420 --> 00:34:04.910
Is it because it helps
their intent argument
00:34:04.910 --> 00:34:08.060
that he\'s got a clear
mind, so he points the gun
00:34:08.060 --> 00:34:10.500
at Kate Steinle and pulls the trigger?
00:34:10.500 --> 00:34:13.060
- For our point of view, this kind of,
00:34:13.060 --> 00:34:17.550
she walks into this
problem, which is, you know,
00:34:17.550 --> 00:34:19.170
look at the physical evidence,
00:34:19.170 --> 00:34:20.480
take the statements out of it.
00:34:20.480 --> 00:34:24.580
\'Cause I could at least make
clear that the inspectors
00:34:24.580 --> 00:34:27.360
are able to get the
defendant to say things
00:34:27.360 --> 00:34:29.020
that are not true.
00:34:29.020 --> 00:34:31.650
He did not shoot her from five feet away,
00:34:31.650 --> 00:34:34.340
but he says that to
them a couple of times.
00:34:34.340 --> 00:34:37.400
He did not walk by her after she was shot.
00:34:37.400 --> 00:34:40.640
So, these are like glaring
errors that they will have
00:34:40.640 --> 00:34:42.420
to attribute to something.
00:34:42.420 --> 00:34:46.657
And it\'s either mental health
or even if it\'s low IQ,
00:34:46.657 --> 00:34:49.493
whatever it is, they\'ll
have something to say,
00:34:49.493 --> 00:34:52.602
he\'s outmatched in that interview.
00:34:52.602 --> 00:34:54.739
So I can work with that.
00:34:54.739 --> 00:34:56.383
- Were you on a pier?
- Yeah.
00:34:56.383 --> 00:34:58.240
- That goes into the
water, were you on a pier?
00:34:58.240 --> 00:34:59.290
Do you understand what I\'m saying?
00:34:59.290 --> 00:35:00.183
- Yeah.
00:35:00.183 --> 00:35:01.016
- Do you understand what I\'m saying?
00:35:01.016 --> 00:35:01.849
- Yes.
00:35:01.849 --> 00:35:04.689
- Do you know what a pier
is? Tell me what he pier is.
00:35:04.689 --> 00:35:05.522
- Pier is?
00:35:05.522 --> 00:35:08.543
- Pier, dock, a dock in the water.
00:35:12.790 --> 00:35:13.623
Okay.
00:35:13.623 --> 00:35:14.722
(Jeff)
So do you think the fact that there\'s
00:35:14.722 --> 00:35:16.950
a little mental illness or at least
00:35:16.950 --> 00:35:19.840
the implication of that helps?
00:35:19.840 --> 00:35:21.981
(Matt)
I think, it does help, but I think
00:35:21.981 --> 00:35:24.739
she has kind of whitewashed
00:35:24.739 --> 00:35:28.110
this to strip that away.
00:35:28.110 --> 00:35:31.740
The mental illness
component of it, I think,
00:35:31.740 --> 00:35:35.650
she will argue is deceptive,
rather than mental health.
00:35:35.650 --> 00:35:38.730
And I think the jury\'s
probably gonna agree
00:35:38.730 --> 00:35:43.170
with her because the portion
she\'s keeping, I think,
00:35:43.170 --> 00:35:44.980
do lean in terms of deception,
00:35:44.980 --> 00:35:46.930
more than they do mental health.
00:35:46.930 --> 00:35:49.490
There are other places
where you could not string
00:35:49.490 --> 00:35:54.490
along paragraphs of word salad
without being mentally ill.
00:35:55.030 --> 00:35:56.600
She\'s cutting all that out.
00:35:56.600 --> 00:35:58.522
- What\'s your birthday?
00:35:58.522 --> 00:36:01.755
- 19...1863.
00:36:02.713 --> 00:36:04.093
- 9-18-63?
00:36:04.093 --> 00:36:05.718
- No, 1863.
00:36:06.746 --> 00:36:08.140
- What year?
00:36:08.140 --> 00:36:09.448
- 1863.
00:36:09.448 --> 00:36:11.208
- 1863?
00:36:11.208 --> 00:36:13.720
- (Matt)
At the end of the case, it\'ll still be,
00:36:13.720 --> 00:36:15.753
got a homeless immigrant,
00:36:15.753 --> 00:36:18.200
English is not his first language,
00:36:18.200 --> 00:36:22.200
got a low education, to help
explain some of his conduct.
00:36:22.200 --> 00:36:26.930
It\'s never been a mental
health defense anyway.
00:36:26.930 --> 00:36:28.079
(Dave)
If you were going to find
00:36:28.079 --> 00:36:30.812
the exact right assailant,
00:36:30.812 --> 00:36:35.370
you would pick an undocumented
immigrant, homeless,
00:36:35.370 --> 00:36:39.920
darker skin, had been in
and out of incarceration
00:36:39.920 --> 00:36:42.860
for over a decade, to say,
00:36:42.860 --> 00:36:46.040
okay, this is what you have to fear.
00:36:46.040 --> 00:36:47.595
And here\'s what he did,
00:36:47.595 --> 00:36:51.440
he took the life of a young white woman.
00:36:51.440 --> 00:36:55.433
Then it\'s time to build a wall
00:36:55.433 --> 00:36:58.930
to keep away those
sorts of people forever.
00:36:58.930 --> 00:37:02.121
(Francisco)
Mr. García Zaraté in the early \'90s,
00:37:02.121 --> 00:37:05.104
had a prior small time
00:37:05.104 --> 00:37:07.162
hand-to-hand drug sale.
00:37:07.162 --> 00:37:10.340
The federal government says
that, if you commit a very,
00:37:10.340 --> 00:37:13.920
very serious offense, and you\'re
deported and you come back,
00:37:13.920 --> 00:37:17.770
they can enhance your
sentence up to 20 years.
00:37:17.770 --> 00:37:20.250
And they call those sentence enhancement,
00:37:20.250 --> 00:37:22.900
predicate crimes, aggravated felonies.
00:37:22.900 --> 00:37:24.750
He accepted a felony
conviction at the height
00:37:24.750 --> 00:37:26.970
of the drug war, no less.
00:37:26.970 --> 00:37:29.560
He was ultimately deported in 1998.
00:37:29.560 --> 00:37:31.540
He came back to the
United States and he was
00:37:31.540 --> 00:37:33.680
prosecuted federally for illegal re-entry.
00:37:33.680 --> 00:37:36.750
Usually, you get six months
in jail for that act.
00:37:36.750 --> 00:37:39.290
But since he had the prior felony,
00:37:39.290 --> 00:37:42.590
aggravated felony drug sale conviction,
00:37:42.590 --> 00:37:45.680
he saw a five-year enhancement.
00:37:45.680 --> 00:37:47.930
So he spent five years in jail.
00:37:47.930 --> 00:37:49.440
He was deported right after that,
00:37:49.440 --> 00:37:51.710
the federal government deported him.
00:37:51.710 --> 00:37:54.500
He came back to the United
States a month later,
00:37:54.500 --> 00:37:55.700
he was apprehended.
00:37:55.700 --> 00:37:58.950
And again, he was prosecuted
for illegal re-entry.
00:37:58.950 --> 00:38:02.210
Again, he took a six year sentence.
00:38:02.210 --> 00:38:05.003
After that six year
sentence, he was deported.
00:38:05.980 --> 00:38:07.803
He came back, again,
00:38:08.970 --> 00:38:11.320
they prosecuted for him
for illegal re-entry.
00:38:11.320 --> 00:38:13.540
And he served a six year sentence.
00:38:13.540 --> 00:38:16.120
We\'re looking at someone
who spent 17 years
00:38:16.120 --> 00:38:18.937
in federal prison for the act of trying
00:38:18.937 --> 00:38:20.655
to come into the country.
00:38:20.655 --> 00:38:22.572
[speaks in Spanish]
00:39:06.910 --> 00:39:09.073
- I know José from my mom.
00:39:11.290 --> 00:39:13.400
I was actually in shock
when she talked to me
00:39:13.400 --> 00:39:15.870
about the case and who was he,
00:39:15.870 --> 00:39:18.513
and how he was related to their family.
00:39:20.670 --> 00:39:22.280
She feels really stressed out
00:39:24.300 --> 00:39:28.676
\'cause none of her family
wanted to cooperate with him.
00:39:28.676 --> 00:39:32.585
(Imelda)
[speaks in Spanish]
00:41:03.446 --> 00:41:05.863
[soft music]
00:41:53.944 --> 00:41:58.090
(Matt)
You know, what happens to García Zaraté?
00:41:58.090 --> 00:41:59.873
He is facing life in prison.
00:42:00.810 --> 00:42:03.920
Even if he were to get a
manslaughter conviction,
00:42:03.920 --> 00:42:05.780
he would be looking at about 19 years
00:42:05.780 --> 00:42:07.470
in prison, potentially.
00:42:07.470 --> 00:42:11.010
And I have no reason to
believe this judge would give
00:42:11.010 --> 00:42:12.693
him any kind of leniency.
00:42:14.200 --> 00:42:18.100
So we\'re trying the case,
trying to win an acquittal,
00:42:18.100 --> 00:42:20.770
and anything less, we
will consider a defeat.
00:42:20.770 --> 00:42:23.294
(Francisco) I have a daughter,
and she\'s everything to me.
00:42:23.294 --> 00:42:25.820
And when this case first happened,
00:42:25.820 --> 00:42:30.420
I held her close because
I could identify as being
00:42:30.420 --> 00:42:32.950
a father losing their daughter.
00:42:32.950 --> 00:42:37.400
One of the reasons this
case was so powerful was
00:42:37.400 --> 00:42:40.993
because so many people could
identify with that story.
00:42:42.140 --> 00:42:44.660
Unfortunately, it was exploited,
00:42:44.660 --> 00:42:48.020
but that essence of a father
and a daughter walking
00:42:48.020 --> 00:42:50.780
down the pier, and a
daughter being shot in front
00:42:50.780 --> 00:42:54.060
of a father, it\'s just
something that, it\'s hard
00:42:54.060 --> 00:42:55.160
to grapple with.
00:42:56.258 --> 00:42:58.841
[gentle music]
00:43:15.315 --> 00:43:19.456
(Paul)
What we saw in the zoomed in shot
00:43:19.456 --> 00:43:23.248
from the DA\'S video,
showed this awning,
00:43:23.248 --> 00:43:25.760
the people walking along
this platform here,
00:43:25.760 --> 00:43:30.550
this dock and this pier,
including all of this detail,
00:43:30.550 --> 00:43:33.433
all mashed into one plane of focus.
00:43:34.870 --> 00:43:36.515
When that happens, it\'s
very hard to differentiate
00:43:36.515 --> 00:43:40.310
what\'s going on and in which location.
00:43:40.310 --> 00:43:42.080
And it\'s just important to be aware
00:43:42.080 --> 00:43:44.090
of that when you\'re looking at the video.
00:43:44.090 --> 00:43:45.760
(Matt)
Why don\'t you narrate a little bit?
00:43:45.760 --> 00:43:47.560
[Paul]
Okay, the first thing I noticed was,
00:43:47.560 --> 00:43:50.030
a person had walked along
the pier and sat into one
00:43:50.030 --> 00:43:54.380
of the two chairs where
the defendant was seen
00:43:54.380 --> 00:43:55.630
sitting later in the day.
00:43:57.480 --> 00:43:58.313
This is around-
00:43:58.313 --> 00:43:59.380
(Matt)
The green arrow represents
00:43:59.380 --> 00:44:01.380
where García Zaraté sits, right?
00:44:01.380 --> 00:44:02.630
(Paul)
The green arrow represents that chair
00:44:02.630 --> 00:44:05.440
where Mr. Zaraté, Mr. García Zaraté sits.
00:44:05.440 --> 00:44:08.350
Use the clock tower
just for relative time.
00:44:08.350 --> 00:44:11.420
It will be accurate to about
a minute or as the hands
00:44:11.420 --> 00:44:12.320
of the clock show.
00:44:14.040 --> 00:44:17.120
And eventually, I believe
that there are six people
00:44:17.120 --> 00:44:20.100
total that will be, that
will congregate in this area
00:44:20.100 --> 00:44:24.280
and actually place an object
00:44:24.280 --> 00:44:25.913
in that chair and go through it.
00:44:28.460 --> 00:44:30.080
But at this point, they
are all congregating
00:44:30.080 --> 00:44:33.221
and they\'re discussing
something amongst themselves.
00:44:33.221 --> 00:44:35.820
(Francisco)
This is like the arrival.
00:44:35.820 --> 00:44:36.653
(Paul)
And at a certain point,
00:44:36.653 --> 00:44:38.210
one of them will go and
get a bag off the ground
00:44:38.210 --> 00:44:40.753
and bring it to that chair there.
00:44:41.970 --> 00:44:42.803
- Show me.
00:44:45.130 --> 00:44:48.130
- The bag is in this area here.
00:44:48.130 --> 00:44:52.030
This man walking to the left will go reach
00:44:52.030 --> 00:44:54.613
over and pick it up, and pick up the bag.
00:45:00.250 --> 00:45:03.453
The person in the light-colored
shirt, who\'s crouching down,
00:45:10.100 --> 00:45:13.753
gets up, moves away a bit,
00:45:16.280 --> 00:45:17.850
and then comes back.
00:45:17.850 --> 00:45:20.860
So, all this bending
down and standing back up
00:45:20.860 --> 00:45:23.970
appears to be people picking
things up off the ground.
00:45:23.970 --> 00:45:27.690
- So, from here, just to be
able to tell the narrative,
00:45:27.690 --> 00:45:30.530
I would wanna say, \"Okay, and
you were able to determine
00:45:30.530 --> 00:45:34.210
that García Zaraté is at that seat,\"
00:45:34.210 --> 00:45:37.640
how many minutes after the
group of six men leave?
00:45:37.640 --> 00:45:38.940
(Paul)
About 30 minutes.
00:45:40.330 --> 00:45:43.120
(Matt)
Instead of about, give me the exact time.
00:45:43.120 --> 00:45:45.400
(Paul)
30 Minutes, 20 seconds.
00:45:45.400 --> 00:45:47.530
(Newscaster #1)
A gut turning twist about the gun
00:45:47.530 --> 00:45:48.950
that divers recovered,
00:45:48.950 --> 00:45:52.400
the one used to kill 32-year
old Katherine Steinle.
00:45:52.400 --> 00:45:55.580
The government issued
weapon belonged to a federal
00:45:55.580 --> 00:45:57.990
agent with the Bureau of Land Management.
00:45:57.990 --> 00:45:59.180
The federal agency says,
00:45:59.180 --> 00:46:01.840
the weapon was stolen
from the officer\'s car,
00:46:01.840 --> 00:46:05.360
while he was on business in
San Francisco on June 27th.
00:46:05.360 --> 00:46:07.460
(Newscaster #2)
A backpack with a fully loaded handgun
00:46:07.460 --> 00:46:09.742
was placed on the floor
behind the driver\'s seat.
00:46:09.742 --> 00:46:12.380
That\'s what Park Ranger John Woychowski
00:46:12.380 --> 00:46:13.933
testified in court today.
00:46:13.933 --> 00:46:15.820
When he came back from having dinner
00:46:15.820 --> 00:46:18.112
with his three children and fiance,
00:46:18.112 --> 00:46:21.510
the backseat window was
smashed out and bag stolen.
00:46:21.510 --> 00:46:22.480
(Newscaster #1) Four days later,
00:46:22.480 --> 00:46:26.980
the 40-caliber handgun somehow
found its way to Pier 14
00:46:26.980 --> 00:46:29.746
into the hands of Juan
Francisco Lopez Sanchez.
00:46:29.746 --> 00:46:34.185
(Reporter) Did you mean to
shoot her? Was it an accident?
00:46:36.272 --> 00:46:37.203
- Yeah.
00:46:38.130 --> 00:46:40.330
- It was an accident.
00:46:40.330 --> 00:46:42.723
Why did you pull the trigger of the gun?
00:46:46.106 --> 00:46:51.106
- When I pulled out my leg
in the ground over here,
00:46:52.880 --> 00:46:57.880
I\'m feeling that something,
no, not too much the...
00:46:58.550 --> 00:46:59.650
- That\'s when you found the gun.
00:46:59.650 --> 00:47:00.483
- Yes.
00:47:00.483 --> 00:47:02.291
(Reporter)
Ask him in Spanish, why did,
00:47:02.291 --> 00:47:05.041
why did he shoot the lady?
00:47:05.041 --> 00:47:09.599
(Interpreter)
[translates in Spanish]
00:47:11.995 --> 00:47:16.895
[speaks in Spanish]
00:47:19.203 --> 00:47:22.444
(Interpreter)
When he grabbed at it, it shot by itself.
00:47:22.444 --> 00:47:25.260
(Juror)
The thing that swayed me towards siding
00:47:25.260 --> 00:47:27.860
with the prosecution the most,
00:47:27.860 --> 00:47:32.860
was just the doubt of, like,
00:47:35.010 --> 00:47:39.380
how could you accidentally do this, right?
00:47:39.380 --> 00:47:42.900
Like, how could you
accidentally discharge a firearm
00:47:42.900 --> 00:47:44.040
and kill somebody?
00:47:44.040 --> 00:47:44.873
- On accidental discharge,
00:47:44.873 --> 00:47:46.648
means you fired the firearm and you didn\'t
00:47:46.648 --> 00:47:47.830
actually mean to.
00:47:47.830 --> 00:47:50.120
The firearm here is a SIG Sauer model
00:47:50.120 --> 00:47:53.310
P239, it\'s a high quality firearm,
00:47:53.310 --> 00:47:56.430
but if you somehow manipulate the trigger,
00:47:56.430 --> 00:47:58.469
either you pull it with
your finger or some other
00:47:58.469 --> 00:48:00.190
object touches the trigger.
00:48:00.190 --> 00:48:04.400
The force is about four
pounds, which is not very much.
00:48:04.400 --> 00:48:07.120
More importantly, the
trigger only has to move
00:48:07.120 --> 00:48:08.350
about an eighth of an inch.
00:48:08.350 --> 00:48:10.510
So you apply this relatively light force
00:48:10.510 --> 00:48:12.400
for this relatively small distance
00:48:12.400 --> 00:48:14.210
and the firearm will discharge.
00:48:14.210 --> 00:48:18.370
- So there\'s no evidence
that the defendant had
00:48:18.370 --> 00:48:20.160
the gun prior to being on the pier.
00:48:20.160 --> 00:48:23.900
There\'s no evidence that he
ever showed a gun to anybody.
00:48:23.900 --> 00:48:25.100
He had no money.
00:48:25.100 --> 00:48:27.300
You\'re significant to us
because you have experience
00:48:27.300 --> 00:48:28.283
with SIG Sauer.
00:48:29.760 --> 00:48:33.310
And you also have law
enforcement, you know, background.
00:48:33.310 --> 00:48:34.651
- Right.
00:48:34.651 --> 00:48:36.040
- You\'ve investigated
accidental discharges,
00:48:36.040 --> 00:48:39.100
you know what to look
for. I think, the jury,
00:48:39.100 --> 00:48:42.960
you will give them a
comfort level when you say,
00:48:42.960 --> 00:48:45.640
look, I\'ve seen this, this happens.
00:48:45.640 --> 00:48:48.840
The point isn\'t that there\'s
a manufacturing defect
00:48:48.840 --> 00:48:52.690
with the gun, that it\'s just
a user error, but it happens,
00:48:52.690 --> 00:48:54.520
you know, even among trained people.
00:48:54.520 --> 00:48:56.490
- Peer reviewed paper in the journal
00:48:56.490 --> 00:48:59.270
of preventive medicine last year
00:48:59.270 --> 00:49:03.020
looked at data from 2010 to 2012,
00:49:03.020 --> 00:49:06.670
582 deaths
00:49:06.670 --> 00:49:09.520
resulted from unintentional discharges
00:49:09.520 --> 00:49:11.150
in the general population in the US.
00:49:11.150 --> 00:49:13.630
They\'re using CDC data.
00:49:13.630 --> 00:49:16.120
(Francisco)
It\'s a tremendous number-
00:49:16.120 --> 00:49:18.573
- 582, that\'s more than one every day.
00:49:21.083 --> 00:49:22.600
And that\'s, that\'s fatalities.
00:49:22.600 --> 00:49:27.140
- So one person dies every day.
00:49:27.140 --> 00:49:29.310
- Three people die every two days.
00:49:29.310 --> 00:49:30.918
- Because of an unintentional firearm...
00:49:30.918 --> 00:49:32.250
- Because of an unintentional discharge.
00:49:32.250 --> 00:49:34.710
When you go into shooting,
00:49:34.710 --> 00:49:37.110
you can\'t automatically
assume that it\'s intentional,
00:49:37.110 --> 00:49:39.569
because there are so many
unintentional discharges.
00:49:39.569 --> 00:49:41.361
You have to consider the possibility
00:49:41.361 --> 00:49:43.403
of an unintentional discharge.
00:49:44.530 --> 00:49:49.080
- Are the number of shots relevant?
00:49:49.080 --> 00:49:51.320
- That\'s the number one. [laughs]
00:49:51.320 --> 00:49:53.940
Indicators of an unintentional discharge,
00:49:53.940 --> 00:49:55.498
firing a single shot.
- Firing a single shot.
00:49:55.498 --> 00:49:56.453
- If you have a single shot,
00:49:56.453 --> 00:49:59.680
then you better sit up and
take notice that you may
00:49:59.680 --> 00:50:01.940
be looking at an unintentional discharge.
00:50:01.940 --> 00:50:05.090
- So tell me the factors
that you\'re looking at.
00:50:05.090 --> 00:50:07.080
- An investigator needs
to look at motivation,
00:50:07.080 --> 00:50:11.000
if there\'s no apparent
motivation for firing the shot,
00:50:11.000 --> 00:50:13.850
then that can be indicator of
an unintentional discharge.
00:50:15.130 --> 00:50:18.620
And lack of planning prior
to the firing of the shot.
00:50:18.620 --> 00:50:21.560
And then last one is the
actions of the shooter
00:50:21.560 --> 00:50:23.583
after the shot is fired.
00:50:24.620 --> 00:50:28.940
Fleeing is one
00:50:28.940 --> 00:50:33.780
that may be an indicator of
an intentional discharge.
00:50:33.780 --> 00:50:35.200
So you have to look at everything.
00:50:35.200 --> 00:50:39.590
And if there are actions
that are consistent
00:50:39.590 --> 00:50:42.598
with an unintentional
discharge in some way,
00:50:42.598 --> 00:50:44.520
that can be a factor too.
00:50:44.520 --> 00:50:46.330
(Matt)
I mean, in our case,
00:50:46.330 --> 00:50:48.030
we believe the defendant fled
00:50:50.170 --> 00:50:52.640
because he did not want
00:50:52.640 --> 00:50:56.020
to draw attention to himself.
00:50:56.020 --> 00:50:59.210
He\'s not here legally,
this thing just happened,
00:50:59.210 --> 00:51:01.800
he wants to get out of there
before anyone sees him.
00:51:01.800 --> 00:51:04.620
- Guns are built so that
when you pick it up,
00:51:04.620 --> 00:51:06.650
your finger naturally
falls on the trigger.
00:51:06.650 --> 00:51:08.442
It has to be that way.
00:51:08.442 --> 00:51:10.570
- Would you consider it safe
to carry this gun around
00:51:10.570 --> 00:51:11.734
in single action mode?
00:51:11.734 --> 00:51:12.793
- No.
- No.
00:51:12.793 --> 00:51:14.442
- Never.
00:51:14.442 --> 00:51:16.550
[gentle music]
00:51:22.389 --> 00:51:25.139
[men chattering]
00:51:26.146 --> 00:51:29.617
- I don\'t know if we need this, all right?
00:51:29.617 --> 00:51:33.534
- All right, somebody
tell me, is this correct?
00:51:41.679 --> 00:51:43.080
- [Francisco] We need a calculator here.
00:51:43.080 --> 00:51:45.210
- I\'m ready.
- Is that a real calculator?
00:51:45.210 --> 00:51:47.353
- It is.
[indistinct]
00:51:47.353 --> 00:51:51.743
- It\'s for the 49 out
of 50 cases. [laughs]
00:51:51.743 --> 00:51:53.745
- That\'s right. Exactly.
00:51:55.496 --> 00:51:57.539
- It\'s 98%, 98%.
00:51:57.539 --> 00:51:59.024
- Calculate my fee, you know,
00:51:59.024 --> 00:52:02.074
I like to do that when I\'m bored.
00:52:27.200 --> 00:52:30.550
(Matt)
One of the advantages to my being involved
00:52:30.550 --> 00:52:33.310
in this case was the fact that I did have
00:52:33.310 --> 00:52:36.070
experience dealing with the media,
00:52:36.070 --> 00:52:39.387
trying to get my story out
there, my narrative out there.
00:52:39.387 --> 00:52:42.520
And I think having engaged
in the kind of lefty
00:52:42.520 --> 00:52:44.800
politics that I\'ve engaged in,
00:52:44.800 --> 00:52:47.380
I\'m comfortable with the establishment
00:52:47.380 --> 00:52:50.460
not being on board and
not supporting my take
00:52:50.460 --> 00:52:55.460
on social issues or whatever
the public policy issue is.
00:52:55.899 --> 00:52:57.160
And the advantage, I think,
00:52:57.160 --> 00:53:00.280
is being able to stay calm about it,
00:53:00.280 --> 00:53:05.280
put out our version of events
and not deviate from that.
00:53:08.819 --> 00:53:10.750
- The illegal said he found
the gun under the bench.
00:53:10.750 --> 00:53:12.390
Do you believe that lie?
00:53:12.390 --> 00:53:15.160
He\'s sitting on a benchy
and the gun went offy.
00:53:15.160 --> 00:53:16.420
They asked them, how did the gun go?
00:53:16.420 --> 00:53:18.860
It shot itself three times.
00:53:18.860 --> 00:53:20.720
Well, I think, that
there\'s a case you have
00:53:20.720 --> 00:53:22.713
to amputate his leg and try his leg.
00:53:24.550 --> 00:53:28.443
- It\'s so critical that
if you have a gun that has
00:53:28.443 --> 00:53:32.390
a right hand twist, that is
the bullets turning clockwise,
00:53:32.390 --> 00:53:35.335
the bullet will always
deflect slightly to the right.
00:53:35.335 --> 00:53:38.200
Colt firearms twist to the left,
00:53:38.200 --> 00:53:40.890
their bullets always deflect
slightly to the left.
00:53:40.890 --> 00:53:44.120
So, it\'s a reproducible real phenomenon,
00:53:44.120 --> 00:53:45.583
it\'s not like a random thing.
00:53:46.930 --> 00:53:47.960
But then the flight of the bullet
00:53:47.960 --> 00:53:49.810
after that is very random.
00:53:49.810 --> 00:53:52.165
So the idea that, I mean,
at least in my opinion,
00:53:52.165 --> 00:53:55.960
that you could purposely
try to shoot somebody 78
00:53:55.960 --> 00:53:57.980
feet away by ricocheting it off the ground
00:53:57.980 --> 00:54:00.589
12 feet in front of you...
00:54:00.589 --> 00:54:02.674
(Reporter #1)
It\'s just what? It\'s just what?
00:54:02.674 --> 00:54:04.814
Let him finish. It\'s just what?
00:54:04.814 --> 00:54:05.647
(Reporter #2)
Wait a minute-
00:54:05.647 --> 00:54:07.700
(Reporter #1)
No, it\'s just what? He didn\'t finish.
00:54:07.700 --> 00:54:08.960
I need this soundbite.
00:54:08.960 --> 00:54:11.230
- It could go straight by chance.
00:54:11.230 --> 00:54:13.390
That is, it goes crooked
and then something pushes
00:54:13.390 --> 00:54:14.740
it back straight, but that doesn\'t happen.
00:54:14.740 --> 00:54:17.090
- The latest twist in the
Kate Steinle murder trial,
00:54:17.090 --> 00:54:18.650
the defense filed a motion,
00:54:18.650 --> 00:54:21.090
asking the judge to
throw out the testimony
00:54:21.090 --> 00:54:23.740
of a key prosecution witness
after it was reported
00:54:23.740 --> 00:54:26.810
that he lied in another
case where the defendant
00:54:26.810 --> 00:54:28.240
was wrongfully convicted.
00:54:28.240 --> 00:54:30.380
(Newscaster #2)
That motion which is now sealed
00:54:30.380 --> 00:54:33.510
asked Judge Samuel Feng
to strike the testimony
00:54:33.510 --> 00:54:36.720
of former CSI Investigator John Evans.
00:54:36.720 --> 00:54:39.633
On October 30th, Evans
testified that based
00:54:39.633 --> 00:54:42.830
on his knowledge of crime
scene investigations,
00:54:42.830 --> 00:54:45.810
in his opinion, García
Zaraté intended to shoot
00:54:45.810 --> 00:54:49.560
Steinle, and that this was
no accidental shooting.
00:54:49.560 --> 00:54:52.020
What the defense did
not know at the time was
00:54:52.020 --> 00:54:53.340
that Evans is being sued
00:54:53.340 --> 00:54:57.810
by Jamal Trulove, a one-time
reality TV show contestant,
00:54:57.810 --> 00:55:00.750
whose conviction was
overturned and then acquitted
00:55:00.750 --> 00:55:02.170
in a second trial.
00:55:02.170 --> 00:55:04.700
Evans testified and was found to have lied
00:55:04.700 --> 00:55:07.552
under oath about reading an
important ballistic study
00:55:07.552 --> 00:55:10.610
done by the San Francisco
Police Department.
00:55:10.610 --> 00:55:14.270
Evans\' forensic statement
was also inconsistent
00:55:14.270 --> 00:55:16.160
with what other experts found.
00:55:16.160 --> 00:55:19.720
- The judge made a
determination to not allow
00:55:19.720 --> 00:55:23.100
the rebuttal evidence, which was in effect
00:55:23.100 --> 00:55:26.930
the recalling of Evans.
00:55:26.930 --> 00:55:30.300
We were prepared to
impeach his credibility,
00:55:30.300 --> 00:55:33.820
particularly because during the trial,
00:55:33.820 --> 00:55:35.370
he was allowed to testify
00:55:35.370 --> 00:55:37.800
without being offered as an expert.
00:55:37.800 --> 00:55:40.880
And I think that\'s a very
key point to keep in mind.
00:55:40.880 --> 00:55:42.870
I think, during cross examination
00:55:42.870 --> 00:55:45.280
it became apparent that
the conclusions that he was
00:55:45.280 --> 00:55:47.200
making were questionable.
00:55:47.200 --> 00:55:51.250
This is obviously a ricochet.
They cannot change that fact.
00:55:51.250 --> 00:55:56.250
So he conceded that you
would have a deflection.
00:55:57.230 --> 00:55:59.220
Well, of course, there was a deflection.
00:55:59.220 --> 00:56:00.600
The bullet hit the concrete.
00:56:00.600 --> 00:56:03.160
I mean, it deflects somewhere else,
00:56:03.160 --> 00:56:07.590
but he continued to insist
that it was a straight line,
00:56:07.590 --> 00:56:10.280
meaning that if you viewed it from above,
00:56:10.280 --> 00:56:13.830
it remained pristine straight.
00:56:13.830 --> 00:56:17.490
Well, this is completely illogical.
00:56:17.490 --> 00:56:19.620
When I asked him during the trial
00:56:19.620 --> 00:56:21.861
whether or not there would be any lateral
00:56:21.861 --> 00:56:24.810
or horizontal movement of the bullet,
00:56:24.810 --> 00:56:28.467
once it hit the concrete, his answer was,
00:56:28.467 --> 00:56:30.750
\"I don\'t understand your question.\"
00:56:30.750 --> 00:56:33.680
- Is the prosecution in
collusion with this witness
00:56:33.680 --> 00:56:35.960
in either the Trulove case or in this case
00:56:35.960 --> 00:56:38.850
to basically get testimony that makes
00:56:38.850 --> 00:56:40.113
their theory look better?
00:56:41.420 --> 00:56:45.950
- Well, I mean, our general
sense of this witness after,
00:56:45.950 --> 00:56:48.260
you know, seeing him on the
stand and cross-examining
00:56:48.260 --> 00:56:50.680
was like, wow, this guy
is willing to say whatever
00:56:50.680 --> 00:56:53.770
he needs to say to help the prosecution.
00:56:53.770 --> 00:56:56.110
- In this case, the fact
that the prosecution
00:56:56.110 --> 00:56:59.320
has offered up no real motive, I think,
00:56:59.320 --> 00:57:01.020
that\'s gonna play a lot in the jury.
00:57:01.020 --> 00:57:04.386
If he is acquitted, it\'s gonna
be a bad backlash of look,
00:57:04.386 --> 00:57:07.420
there goes liberal San Francisco again.
00:57:07.420 --> 00:57:09.180
- You know, that\'s why
it\'s important what you do,
00:57:09.180 --> 00:57:14.180
because you\'re able to
explain as much as people
00:57:15.130 --> 00:57:19.250
wanna hear what the
evidence was in this case.
00:57:19.250 --> 00:57:23.280
- My administration is
launching a nationwide crackdown
00:57:23.280 --> 00:57:26.490
on sanctuary cities.
[crowd cheering]
00:57:26.490 --> 00:57:28.380
(Newscaster)
President Trump and conservatives
00:57:28.380 --> 00:57:31.080
have used the case as a rallying cry.
00:57:31.080 --> 00:57:33.760
The bill known as Kate\'s
Law passed by the House,
00:57:33.760 --> 00:57:36.560
but hung up in the Senate
would enhance penalties
00:57:36.560 --> 00:57:39.840
for deported criminals who
illegally re-enter the US.
00:57:39.840 --> 00:57:41.210
- From the immigration debate
00:57:41.210 --> 00:57:44.080
in the United States, the
stakes are pretty high
00:57:44.080 --> 00:57:45.010
\'cause you\'ve got things like
00:57:45.010 --> 00:57:48.720
Kate\'s Law that would increase punishment
00:57:48.720 --> 00:57:52.250
for basically any immigrant that enters
00:57:52.250 --> 00:57:54.340
the country without
permission if they\'ve ever
00:57:54.340 --> 00:57:56.440
been deported before.
00:57:56.440 --> 00:57:57.700
- Your reaction to what\'s happened
00:57:57.700 --> 00:57:59.530
in San Francisco and Washington.
00:57:59.530 --> 00:58:02.150
- Deep down, when we was
in Washington, I didn\'t get
00:58:02.150 --> 00:58:04.770
the feeling, any warm and fuzzy feeling
00:58:04.770 --> 00:58:09.770
that Kate\'s Law would hit
the Senate or be passed.
00:58:10.830 --> 00:58:14.780
- It\'s not against the
sanctuary city policy itself.
00:58:14.780 --> 00:58:17.680
The original sanctuary city
policy was put in place
00:58:17.680 --> 00:58:21.370
to make illegal immigrants
that are in this country
00:58:21.370 --> 00:58:23.410
feel as though they
can go to the hospital,
00:58:23.410 --> 00:58:25.653
they can call in and report crimes.
00:58:26.550 --> 00:58:28.930
That\'s the basis of the
sanctuary city policy,
00:58:28.930 --> 00:58:29.797
and we\'re not against that.
00:58:29.797 --> 00:58:33.970
- You have efforts in
Congress right now to try
00:58:33.970 --> 00:58:37.200
to not only take away
funding from municipalities
00:58:37.200 --> 00:58:39.440
with sanctuary city policies,
00:58:39.440 --> 00:58:41.930
but an effort to stop municipalities
00:58:41.930 --> 00:58:43.440
from passing such laws.
00:58:43.440 --> 00:58:44.547
- What we\'re fighting against
00:58:44.547 --> 00:58:46.850
is keeping the felons off the streets.
00:58:46.850 --> 00:58:49.330
- Kate\'s Law wouldn\'t
have affected this case
00:58:49.330 --> 00:58:50.480
in the slightest.
00:58:50.480 --> 00:58:51.960
- In the past five years,
00:58:51.960 --> 00:58:55.200
we\'ve seen some of the
highest deportation rates
00:58:55.200 --> 00:58:56.460
this country has ever seen.
00:58:56.460 --> 00:58:58.850
We\'ve seen about 3
million people deported,
00:58:58.850 --> 00:59:01.994
half of which have a US citizen child.
00:59:01.994 --> 00:59:04.533
And virtually, the vast majority
00:59:04.533 --> 00:59:09.521
of those deportations have
been because of a very
00:59:09.521 --> 00:59:12.160
minor contact with local law enforcement.
00:59:12.160 --> 00:59:14.940
The federal authorities that wanna engage
00:59:14.940 --> 00:59:18.810
in mass deportation understand
that the word criminal
00:59:18.810 --> 00:59:20.980
is a very powerful word.
00:59:20.980 --> 00:59:23.810
It is a brand against a person.
00:59:23.810 --> 00:59:27.660
And if you can criminalize a people,
00:59:27.660 --> 00:59:31.630
it is easier to win public
support for something
00:59:31.630 --> 00:59:35.773
as serious and severe and
catastrophic as deportation.
00:59:35.773 --> 00:59:38.356
[haunting music]
00:59:50.930 --> 00:59:52.810
- (Newscaster #1)
While José Ines García Zaraté,
00:59:52.810 --> 00:59:55.500
has been charged with
second degree murder,
00:59:55.500 --> 00:59:56.570
the jury was told,
00:59:56.570 --> 00:59:58.980
they could also consider
first degree murder
00:59:58.980 --> 01:00:01.340
or involuntary manslaughter.
01:00:01.340 --> 01:00:04.400
A not guilty verdict
is also a possibility.
01:00:04.400 --> 01:00:05.940
Following those instructions,
01:00:05.940 --> 01:00:08.280
Assistant District Attorney Diana Garcia,
01:00:08.280 --> 01:00:10.010
made her closing arguments,
01:00:10.010 --> 01:00:13.320
insisting that the gun that
killed Kate Steinle, didn\'t
01:00:13.320 --> 01:00:14.746
go off accidentally.
01:00:14.746 --> 01:00:17.480
- What did you think
of her closing overall?
01:00:17.480 --> 01:00:19.440
- She went all in on he was planning
01:00:19.440 --> 01:00:21.240
to shoot and kill someone.
01:00:21.240 --> 01:00:23.210
(Newscaster)
In fact, she told the jury
01:00:23.210 --> 01:00:24.980
that García Zaraté had the gun
01:00:24.980 --> 01:00:28.140
with him all along and
knew that Pier 14 was
01:00:28.140 --> 01:00:30.860
a target-rich environment full of people.
01:00:30.860 --> 01:00:32.390
- What do you guys think?
01:00:32.390 --> 01:00:33.810
- She called it a secret game
01:00:33.810 --> 01:00:35.570
as though he had something going.
01:00:35.570 --> 01:00:39.190
She projected a lot of
intentionality into the defendant.
01:00:39.190 --> 01:00:41.397
- (Jeff) She said it was a secret game?
- Secret game.
01:00:41.397 --> 01:00:43.455
(Francisco)
A secret game of Russian roulette.
01:00:44.487 --> 01:00:46.261
(Francisco)
She didn\'t call it a ricochet,
01:00:46.261 --> 01:00:49.293
called it a glance?
- (Man) Glance.
01:00:49.293 --> 01:00:54.210
- It may have been effective
to some jurors, but you know,
01:00:54.210 --> 01:00:55.830
she isn\'t gonna get the last word.
01:00:55.830 --> 01:00:57.260
(Newscaster)
The defense reminded the jury
01:00:57.260 --> 01:01:00.010
that García Zaraté had
no motive and no prior
01:01:00.010 --> 01:01:01.600
interaction with Steinle.
01:01:01.600 --> 01:01:04.850
Matt Gonzalez said, \"If you
wanted to injure someone,
01:01:04.850 --> 01:01:07.266
would you fire from 90 feet away?\"
01:01:07.266 --> 01:01:08.718
- I mean I really like you coming back
01:01:08.718 --> 01:01:10.200
to the only evidence they have
01:01:10.200 --> 01:01:13.330
that he carried a gun on the pier
01:01:13.330 --> 01:01:15.940
is the fact that the
gun fits in his pockets.
01:01:15.940 --> 01:01:18.280
How can you premeditate a homicide
01:01:18.280 --> 01:01:20.520
when you don\'t even know a gun is loaded?
01:01:20.520 --> 01:01:23.890
- I mean, she really went
so strong, that that kind
01:01:23.890 --> 01:01:26.160
of emotional thing wears off.
01:01:26.160 --> 01:01:28.750
Giving them the keys for
how to look at the evidence
01:01:28.750 --> 01:01:31.647
and sort it out, that\'s what lasts.
01:01:31.647 --> 01:01:34.224
[gentle music]
01:01:34.224 --> 01:01:35.630
(Juror)
Any number of things could have led
01:01:35.630 --> 01:01:36.950
to a different outcome here, right?
01:01:36.950 --> 01:01:39.810
The ranger storing a gun
in a different place,
01:01:39.810 --> 01:01:42.360
or even just parking in a different place
01:01:42.360 --> 01:01:44.900
in San Francisco, or the
Steinles taking a different
01:01:44.900 --> 01:01:45.963
route on their walk.
01:01:46.851 --> 01:01:49.006
It was just the perfect storm.
01:01:49.006 --> 01:01:51.589
[gentle music]
01:02:15.682 --> 01:02:18.750
- What this will allow me to
do is to say, think about it,
01:02:18.750 --> 01:02:21.730
Woychowsky always takes his gun with him,
01:02:21.730 --> 01:02:22.972
but he doesn\'t this time.
01:02:22.972 --> 01:02:26.190
Woychowsky is on a vacation, but he\'s got,
01:02:26.190 --> 01:02:29.050
he makes all these
choices, any one of which,
01:02:29.050 --> 01:02:32.020
if decided differently,
this never happens.
01:02:32.020 --> 01:02:35.893
Then the gun is in unknown
place for four days.
01:02:36.970 --> 01:02:38.010
You have this thing,
01:02:38.010 --> 01:02:39.760
we don\'t know why somebody left it there,
01:02:39.760 --> 01:02:41.840
we don\'t know what their intentions were.
01:02:41.840 --> 01:02:43.962
They may have decided that
because they knew it was
01:02:43.962 --> 01:02:46.440
a Bureau of Land Management,
that they didn\'t wanna
01:02:46.440 --> 01:02:47.610
have it any more.
01:02:47.610 --> 01:02:51.370
An unforeseen accident is an
exceptional accident, right?
01:02:51.370 --> 01:02:54.070
(Francisco)
Are we taking away reasonable doubt?
01:02:54.070 --> 01:02:55.484
\'Cause, well, everybody doubts.
01:02:55.484 --> 01:02:57.376
(Matt)
I think it\'s okay.
01:02:58.363 --> 01:03:00.713
What has been proved
beyond a reasonable doubt?
01:03:15.010 --> 01:03:18.053
(Matt)
García Zaraté picked up an object,
01:03:18.053 --> 01:03:22.470
did not know its contents,
and it fired a bullet.
01:03:22.470 --> 01:03:24.370
He had no intention to hurt anyone.
01:03:24.370 --> 01:03:28.480
He was not engaged in
any criminal negligence.
01:03:28.480 --> 01:03:30.490
It was an accident.
01:03:30.490 --> 01:03:32.520
And as long as that\'s a
reasonable interpretation,
01:03:32.520 --> 01:03:34.630
they have to adopt it, right?
01:03:34.630 --> 01:03:35.646
- (Zac) Mm-hm.
01:03:35.646 --> 01:03:37.105
Okay guys, let\'s do it.
01:03:37.105 --> 01:03:39.686
[dramatic music]
01:03:56.479 --> 01:03:58.450
(Dave)
Whatever happens in that courtroom
01:03:58.450 --> 01:04:03.442
is ultimately gonna be
either proof that we have,
01:04:03.442 --> 01:04:06.442
in theory, a working system
01:04:06.442 --> 01:04:09.208
that gives everybody the presumption
01:04:09.208 --> 01:04:12.960
of innocence and a fair and speedy trial,
01:04:12.960 --> 01:04:17.260
or we\'re going to have a
system that can be bent
01:04:17.260 --> 01:04:21.583
and compromised by politics
coming from one demagogue.
01:04:30.370 --> 01:04:33.011
- We had a chance to speak briefly
01:04:33.011 --> 01:04:36.600
with Mr. García Zaraté.
01:04:36.600 --> 01:04:37.490
He\'s hopeful.
01:04:37.490 --> 01:04:39.380
- Ms. Garcia put her blood, her sweat
01:04:39.380 --> 01:04:42.120
and her tears in this
case, she worked very hard.
01:04:42.120 --> 01:04:43.810
She did an amazing job.
01:04:43.810 --> 01:04:46.263
And at this point, it\'s
in the hands of the jury.
01:04:50.137 --> 01:04:50.970
- It\'s crazy.
01:04:50.970 --> 01:04:52.292
- You\'re gonna help me remove my jacket.
01:04:52.292 --> 01:04:55.272
I got my arms still in
and stuck. Oh, thanks.
01:04:55.272 --> 01:04:56.105
Thank you.
01:04:58.010 --> 01:05:00.451
(Francisco)
I get just so incredibly frustrated
01:05:00.451 --> 01:05:04.320
with the national press, and
how they\'ve reported this,
01:05:04.320 --> 01:05:06.560
catapulting this candidate
01:05:06.560 --> 01:05:09.330
because of hatred towards immigrants.
01:05:09.330 --> 01:05:13.023
And this case has been used
so effectively by Trump,
01:05:14.210 --> 01:05:18.860
but the co-conspirators are this national
01:05:18.860 --> 01:05:20.892
media that just didn\'t
get the story right.
01:05:20.892 --> 01:05:22.241
(Jeff)
So, you\'re ready?
01:05:22.241 --> 01:05:24.200
- I am ready, yeah.
- (Jeff) Yeah.
01:05:24.200 --> 01:05:27.560
- A lot of work, you know,
two and a half years almost.
01:05:27.560 --> 01:05:30.680
I\'m satisfied that we\'ve got it to a place
01:05:31.990 --> 01:05:34.233
where the jury can do the right thing.
01:05:36.772 --> 01:05:38.370
If we lose the case,
01:05:38.370 --> 01:05:41.460
it\'ll strictly be because
we don\'t have jurors
01:05:41.460 --> 01:05:42.780
that we thought we had.
01:05:42.780 --> 01:05:44.660
It\'s like all cases, Jeff, you know,
01:05:44.660 --> 01:05:46.673
if you win a case like this,
01:05:48.630 --> 01:05:51.700
you have the feeling
afterwards that anybody could
01:05:51.700 --> 01:05:52.590
have won this case.
01:05:52.590 --> 01:05:55.620
And if you lose a case
like this, you feel like,
01:05:55.620 --> 01:05:57.128
I\'m the only person that could have
01:05:57.128 --> 01:05:58.653
lost this case, you know.
01:05:58.653 --> 01:06:03.612
[bell chiming]
01:06:08.880 --> 01:06:12.970
- It\'s hard to fathom the
death of my daughter on a pier.
01:06:12.970 --> 01:06:16.581
And when you have a broken heart,
01:06:16.581 --> 01:06:19.890
and have grief in your life,
01:06:19.890 --> 01:06:22.730
if you\'ve never had it, it\'s awful.
01:06:22.730 --> 01:06:25.863
(Brad Steinle) The system both
on a city and federal level,
01:06:26.810 --> 01:06:29.690
miserably failed in protecting Kate.
01:06:29.690 --> 01:06:33.580
The failure on all levels
is what led to her death.
01:06:33.580 --> 01:06:35.540
And I think they share as much blame,
01:06:35.540 --> 01:06:38.002
if not more, than Sanchez.
01:06:38.002 --> 01:06:42.140
- I\'m feeling that I\'m
sorry for everybody.
01:06:42.140 --> 01:06:43.973
(Reporter)
You feel sorry for everybody,
01:06:45.340 --> 01:06:47.853
including Kate Steinle\'s family?
01:06:48.866 --> 01:06:49.803
- Yeah.
01:06:52.170 --> 01:06:55.425
- We somehow or another
amazingly got caught up
01:06:55.425 --> 01:06:58.077
in immigration and Trump,
01:06:58.077 --> 01:07:01.020
and we have our views on immigration,
01:07:01.020 --> 01:07:02.380
we have our views on Trump,
01:07:02.380 --> 01:07:04.963
but this was the death of my daughter.
01:07:06.030 --> 01:07:10.062
The manipulation, using
her death as impetus
01:07:10.062 --> 01:07:13.822
for immigration reviews
and sanctuary cities,
01:07:13.822 --> 01:07:16.920
and all that we\'re, you
know, dealing with now,
01:07:16.920 --> 01:07:20.643
nothing\'s changed except Kate\'s not here.
01:07:21.522 --> 01:07:25.048
[tense upbeat music]
01:07:29.717 --> 01:07:32.810
(Woman)
All right, 21. Thank you. Angela.
01:07:32.810 --> 01:07:33.643
(Angela)
Yes.
01:07:34.767 --> 01:07:36.934
(Woman)
SF Weekly. CNN.
01:08:01.779 --> 01:08:03.006
- The prosecutors have walked in.
01:08:03.006 --> 01:08:05.590
There\'s also a delegation
from the Mexican consulate,
01:08:05.590 --> 01:08:06.890
that we saw walk in as well.
01:08:06.890 --> 01:08:08.860
As you mentioned, the defendant
01:08:08.860 --> 01:08:10.270
is an undocumented immigrant,
01:08:10.270 --> 01:08:13.083
who has himself been deported five times.
01:08:21.103 --> 01:08:23.383
- Lyanne Melendez, just
out of the courtroom,
01:08:23.383 --> 01:08:24.770
and is there a verdict?
01:08:24.770 --> 01:08:27.080
- There is, rather surprising.
01:08:27.080 --> 01:08:29.030
First degree murder, not guilty,
01:08:29.030 --> 01:08:31.010
second degree murder, not guilty,
01:08:31.010 --> 01:08:34.890
involuntary manslaughter, not guilty.
01:08:34.890 --> 01:08:38.880
Now, there was one guilty found
by the members of the jury,
01:08:38.880 --> 01:08:41.793
and that is possession of a firearm.
01:08:41.793 --> 01:08:44.521
[people chattering]
01:08:44.521 --> 01:08:45.704
(Woman)
Any comment?
01:08:45.704 --> 01:08:46.754
(Man)
Any comment?
01:08:46.754 --> 01:08:48.273
(Alex)
I promise you we\'ll be right back.
01:08:49.197 --> 01:08:51.147
(Man)
Coming back, coming back, guys.
01:08:53.845 --> 01:08:55.527
(Woman)
I think we\'re over here, Matt.
01:08:55.527 --> 01:08:59.578
[cameras shutters clicking]
01:09:04.137 --> 01:09:09.060
- First of all, let me
start out by expressing
01:09:09.060 --> 01:09:12.120
my sincere condolences
01:09:12.120 --> 01:09:13.643
to the Steinle family.
01:09:14.978 --> 01:09:19.978
I hope that they do not
interpret this verdict
01:09:20.170 --> 01:09:25.170
as diminishing in anyway the awful tragedy
01:09:25.320 --> 01:09:28.300
that occurred and that
their family has suffered.
01:09:28.300 --> 01:09:30.740
(Jeff) The challenge of the
defense was that they had
01:09:30.740 --> 01:09:35.700
to present the evidence,
not only to the jury,
01:09:35.700 --> 01:09:37.570
but also to the community.
01:09:37.570 --> 01:09:42.120
- Nothing about Mr.
García Zaraté\'s ethnicity,
01:09:42.120 --> 01:09:44.840
nothing about his immigration status,
01:09:44.840 --> 01:09:48.430
nothing about the fact
that he is born in Mexico,
01:09:48.430 --> 01:09:53.430
had any relevance as to what
happened on July 1st, 2015.
01:09:53.930 --> 01:09:56.920
We believe the verdict is a correct
01:09:56.920 --> 01:09:59.450
and accurate reflection of
the law and what happened.
01:09:59.450 --> 01:10:02.890
- This jury\'s verdict should be respected.
01:10:02.890 --> 01:10:07.598
They heard the evidence,
they deliberated as a group,
01:10:07.598 --> 01:10:09.930
they heard readback testimony,
01:10:09.930 --> 01:10:13.040
they looked at the physical
evidence and they rendered
01:10:13.040 --> 01:10:15.640
a verdict to the best of their abilities
01:10:15.640 --> 01:10:17.300
in accordance with the law.
01:10:17.300 --> 01:10:18.720
- From day one,
01:10:18.720 --> 01:10:23.663
this case was used as
a means to foment hate,
01:10:24.530 --> 01:10:29.250
to foment division,
and to foment a program
01:10:29.250 --> 01:10:30.833
of mass deportation.
01:10:31.670 --> 01:10:35.189
And I believe today is a vindication
01:10:35.189 --> 01:10:36.694
for the rights of immigrants.
01:10:36.694 --> 01:10:41.694
- For those who might
criticize this verdict,
01:10:41.940 --> 01:10:43.960
there are a number of
people that have commented
01:10:43.960 --> 01:10:47.080
on this case in the last couple of years,
01:10:47.080 --> 01:10:49.830
the Attorney General of the
United States, the President,
01:10:49.830 --> 01:10:52.090
the Vice President of the United States.
01:10:52.090 --> 01:10:56.480
Let me just remind them
that they are themselves
01:10:56.480 --> 01:11:00.290
under investigation by special prosecutor
01:11:00.290 --> 01:11:01.570
in Washington, DC,
01:11:01.570 --> 01:11:05.770
and they may themselves
soon avail themselves
01:11:05.770 --> 01:11:08.660
of the presumption of innocence and beyond
01:11:08.660 --> 01:11:10.460
a reasonable doubt standard.
01:11:10.460 --> 01:11:12.800
And so I would ask them
to reflect on that before
01:11:12.800 --> 01:11:16.505
they comment or disparage
the result in this case.
01:11:24.420 --> 01:11:26.690
- How can you make a
comparison with this man
01:11:26.690 --> 01:11:28.960
and with President Trump,
when he should not have been
01:11:28.960 --> 01:11:32.050
in this country, why was this
not involuntary manslaughter?
01:11:32.050 --> 01:11:34.960
- It\'s not involuntary
manslaughter because in order
01:11:34.960 --> 01:11:38.120
to prove it, the prosecution
had to prove brandishing
01:11:38.120 --> 01:11:40.710
of a weapon, which is in a rude, angry,
01:11:40.710 --> 01:11:43.760
or threatening manner,
and criminal negligence,
01:11:43.760 --> 01:11:46.837
which would be that he
knew that he had a gun
01:11:46.837 --> 01:11:50.520
and he handled it in a way
that was dangerous to others.
01:11:50.520 --> 01:11:53.920
The jury clearly rejected that
having heard the evidence.
01:11:53.920 --> 01:11:55.500
(Juror)
No one was around this guy, right?
01:11:55.500 --> 01:11:57.370
He wasn\'t really in
the presence of others.
01:11:57.370 --> 01:11:59.220
They were 90 feet away.
01:11:59.220 --> 01:12:02.630
And he certainly wasn\'t doing
it in like a threatening
01:12:02.630 --> 01:12:05.210
or menacing manner, it
didn\'t appear so, right?
01:12:05.210 --> 01:12:07.670
No one even really saw him with the gun.
01:12:07.670 --> 01:12:09.586
And so we asked the judge,
01:12:09.586 --> 01:12:11.900
if we find him not guilty of brandishing,
01:12:11.900 --> 01:12:13.620
must we also find him not guilty
01:12:13.620 --> 01:12:15.560
of involuntary manslaughter?
01:12:15.560 --> 01:12:18.607
Came back, yes. And we\'re like, okay.
01:12:18.607 --> 01:12:22.490
- You can\'t try a case
on the campaign trail.
01:12:22.490 --> 01:12:25.802
You can\'t try a case via tweet.
01:12:25.802 --> 01:12:28.280
You can\'t try a case no
matter how many people
01:12:28.280 --> 01:12:30.495
want to assume a verdict.
01:12:30.495 --> 01:12:33.554
if not for a full-throated,
01:12:33.554 --> 01:12:35.270
incredibly thorough defense,
01:12:35.270 --> 01:12:37.030
this guy might\'ve gotten railroaded.
01:12:37.030 --> 01:12:38.040
And that would have been that.
01:12:38.040 --> 01:12:40.950
And nobody would have
said a word about it.
01:12:40.950 --> 01:12:42.666
He would\'ve gone away for life.
01:12:42.666 --> 01:12:43.566
Tense dramatic music
01:12:43.566 --> 01:12:45.520
- A striking evening in justice,
01:12:45.520 --> 01:12:47.920
and in the cases revolving
around immigration
01:12:47.920 --> 01:12:49.830
and illegal immigration in this country,
01:12:49.830 --> 01:12:53.435
as Kate Steinle finds
no justice this evening.
01:12:53.435 --> 01:12:57.419
- Build Kate\'s wall! Build Kate\'s wall!
01:12:57.419 --> 01:12:58.930
Build Kate\'s wall!
01:12:58.930 --> 01:13:03.850
- The President was using
him as a way to project
01:13:03.850 --> 01:13:07.060
a pathology onto all
Mexicans or all immigrants,
01:13:07.060 --> 01:13:10.218
or even all Mexican immigrants
who might even be criminal.
01:13:10.218 --> 01:13:13.750
And I see that happen over
and over and over again,
01:13:13.750 --> 01:13:16.041
but only happen among people of color.
01:13:34.417 --> 01:13:36.791
Jeff Adachi, fight the power!
01:13:36.791 --> 01:13:39.067
Jeff Adachi, fight the power!
01:13:39.067 --> 01:13:41.259
Jeff Adachi, fight the power!
01:14:19.821 --> 01:14:23.071
[gentle, upbeat music]
Distributor: GOOD DOCS
Length: 76 minutes
Date: 2021
Genre: Expository
Language: English; Spanish / English subtitles
Grade: College, Adults
Color/BW:
Closed Captioning: Available
Existing customers, please log in to view this film.
New to Docuseek? Register to request a quote.