The first major feature documentary film revealing the impact of overfishing…
One Ocean: The Changing Sea
- Description
- Reviews
- Citation
- Cataloging
- Transcript
Strange days are dawning in the global sea. Creatures are on the move. Dead zones are expanding. The foundation of life is slowly eroding. It's hard to imagine that humans could ever alter something as vast as the ocean, but that's exactly what we're doing. Over the past 200 years, we've poured more than two trillion metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
As THE CHANGING SEA vividly illustrates, that carbon dioxide isn't just changing the climate on land. It's transforming the ocean in ways that haven't been seen for millions of years. Scientists around the world are in a race to understand these changes and what they'll mean for thousands of species - including ours.
'Very impressive! One Ocean is an exceptional series of videos focused on some of the most pressing problems threatening the health and future of the oceans. Accompanying highly respected scientists on research cruises and underwater dives, Footprints in the Sand and The Changing Sea present a powerful set of interviews and images that clearly explain the science behind the complex issues of hypoxia, ocean acidification, and overfishing. The geographic diversity of the areas covered, the superb quality and high definition videos, and the lucid explanations of the science provide a powerful and credible set of stories...These are moving and compelling stories of ocean researchers investigating the problems humans have created in the sea and explaining why our one ocean needs our help now.' Dr. Gary Griggs, Distinguished Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Director of the Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Author, Living with the Changing California Coast and Introduction to California Beaches and Coast
'There are a lot of DVDs available on topics relating to the ocean, but these are some of the best I have seen. I enjoyed the way in which information was conveyed and was pleased to learn things I had not seen in previous videos... I highly recommend this series to public, high-school, and college libraries.' Barbara Butler, University of Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Educational Media Reviews Online
'Puts viewers in the passenger seat along-side scientists, fishermen and explorers on numerous ocean-going expeditions...Most impressive is the ample footage from deep-sea explorations--courtesy of research submersibles. These give us a window into alien worlds...Appropriate for audiences from grade school students to adults.' Timothy Oleson, EARTH Magazine
'The Changing Sea is a compelling introduction to a series of modern ocean mysteries and troubling trends that scientists are investigating. Each is explained with a combination of stunning video close-ups and landscape views and interviews with fishermen and scientists who are on the front lines and on the case. The stories provide reason for grave concern but ultimately invite and encourage each of us to participate in envisioning new ways to relate to the ocean world.' John C. Anderson, Director of Education, New England Aquarium
'Very well done. The subjects chosen in The Changing Sea, the systems used to illustrate them, and the scientists interviewed were just right. The footage and dialogue were terrific.' Dr. Joseph Torres, Professor, Biological Oceanography, University of South Florida
'The Changing Sea makes convincing connections that illuminate additive and maybe synergistic negative human impacts on marine systems that are often so subtle as to be overlooked. Minor changes in ocean temperatures, pH, salinity and species composition may go unnoticed by casual observers. Taken together, these seemingly minor changes are likely to lead to unintended negative consequences of major magnitude. I will use it in the classroom to inform a discussion of how feedback loops at any level in a food web can lead to unintended consequences.' Dr. Donald Baltz, Professor and Chair, Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University
'I have finally found a film series that thoroughly covers all of the current marine topics that I teach in the classroom which includes MPAs, marine ecosystems, sustainability, international coastal culture, climate change and the formation of ocean life. It is presented in a sense of urgency and at the same time provides essential background information peaking the viewer's interest with animations and interviews with seasoned marine scientists and beautiful cinematography! One Ocean should be an integral part of any environmental studies course.' Michelle Ashley, Environmental Science teacher, South Aiken High School
'The Changing Sea presents fascinating case studies of the looming threats of the evil twins of ocean warming and acidification...Ocean warming is already disrupting ocean ecosystems. Also caused by carbon emissions, ocean acidification [is] a global problem that will worsen unless society finally addresses the dangers of unlimited burning of fossil fuels and forests.' Dr. Mark Hixon, Professor of Marine Conservation and Biology, Department of Zoology, Oregon State University
'[The Changing Sea is] a classroom friendly program that will enhance general science and environmental science classes studying oceanography.' Patricia Ann Owens, School Library Journal
'All the videos in this series are visually stimulating, and [The Changing Sea] is no exception...These videos should become an integral part of any library or multi-media part of a teacher's arsenal. Both informative and awakening, they were expertly produced, and it shows on all levels.' Marc Zucker, Assistant Professor, NSTA Recommends
Citation
Main credits
Suzuki, David T. (narrator)
Buffie, Erna (film director)
Jensen-Carr, Merit (film producer)
Moore, Sandra (film producer)
Other credits
Editor, David McGunigal; cinematography, Barry Lank, Keith Eidse, Ian Kerr; music, Shawn Pierce.
Distributor subjects
Biology; Climate Change/Global Warming; Earth Science; Ecology; Environment; Fisheries; Geography; Geology; Global Issues; Habitat; Marine Biology; Oceans and Coasts; Pacific Studies; Pollution; SustainabilityKeywords
WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.360
00:00:06.360 --> 00:00:09.580
It\'s close to midnight, and
scientists are just
00:00:09.580 --> 00:00:12.020
beginning their day.
00:00:12.020 --> 00:00:14.370
Moored in the middle of
the North Pacific,
00:00:14.370 --> 00:00:17.905
they\'re jigging for squid.
00:00:17.905 --> 00:00:21.080
But the squid they want to
catch is no ordinary
00:00:21.080 --> 00:00:22.330
cephalopod.
00:00:22.330 --> 00:00:24.940
00:00:24.940 --> 00:00:29.350
It\'s a voracious predator native
to Mexican waters.
00:00:29.350 --> 00:00:32.299
And now, it\'s raiding
the Canadian coast.
00:00:32.299 --> 00:00:34.860
00:00:34.860 --> 00:00:39.490
Strange days are dawning
in the global sea.
00:00:39.490 --> 00:00:43.570
Creatures are on the move.
00:00:43.570 --> 00:00:45.480
Dead zones are expanding.
00:00:45.480 --> 00:00:51.430
And the foundation of life
is slowly eroding.
00:00:51.430 --> 00:00:55.260
Scientists around the world are
in a race to understand
00:00:55.260 --> 00:01:00.360
those changes and what they\'ll
mean for thousands of species,
00:01:00.360 --> 00:01:01.610
including ours.
00:01:01.610 --> 00:01:24.590
00:01:24.590 --> 00:01:27.490
This is sea water, and the Earth
is covered in more than
00:01:27.490 --> 00:01:29.850
a billion, billion tons of it.
00:01:29.850 --> 00:01:32.330
It\'s hard to imagine that
humans could ever
00:01:32.330 --> 00:01:35.760
fundamentally alter something
as vast as the ocean.
00:01:35.760 --> 00:01:38.180
But that\'s exactly
what we\'re doing.
00:01:38.180 --> 00:01:41.140
We\'re interfering with basic
systems that have kept the
00:01:41.140 --> 00:01:43.520
ocean in sync for millions
of years.
00:01:43.520 --> 00:01:46.800
It means we\'re messing with the
life support system of the
00:01:46.800 --> 00:01:49.000
planet, ours included.
00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:52.410
We now have a choice in shaping
the future ocean.
00:01:52.410 --> 00:01:55.270
The question is, which future
will we choose?
00:01:55.270 --> 00:02:02.900
00:02:02.900 --> 00:02:06.350
On the west coast of Vancouver
Island, a fishing boat heads
00:02:06.350 --> 00:02:08.449
into port to offload
its catch.
00:02:08.449 --> 00:02:12.180
00:02:12.180 --> 00:02:14.490
It\'s been an unusual
season for hake
00:02:14.490 --> 00:02:16.700
fisherman, Corey Gale.
00:02:16.700 --> 00:02:21.690
The predator from Mexico has
invaded his fishing grounds.
00:02:21.690 --> 00:02:22.660
I was quite surprised.
00:02:22.660 --> 00:02:24.150
We just caught a
Humboldt squid.
00:02:24.150 --> 00:02:25.660
And we\'re only eight miles
off [INAUDIBLE]
00:02:25.660 --> 00:02:27.010
where we caught this fish.
00:02:27.010 --> 00:02:29.915
And the amount that we\'re seeing
now in the area, it\'s
00:02:29.915 --> 00:02:31.165
just unprecedented, really.
00:02:31.165 --> 00:02:34.620
00:02:34.620 --> 00:02:36.720
It is impacting our fishery,
because they are
00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:37.600
showing up in our nets.
00:02:37.600 --> 00:02:40.830
And the hake that come up with
them, half of them, they\'re
00:02:40.830 --> 00:02:41.250
chewed right up.
00:02:41.250 --> 00:02:42.840
They\'re half eaten.
00:02:42.840 --> 00:02:45.150
This is a smaller Humboldt.
00:02:45.150 --> 00:02:47.150
We\'ve weighed mantles
at 25 pounds,
00:02:47.150 --> 00:02:48.910
just the mantle itself.
00:02:48.910 --> 00:02:51.920
They\'ve got a pretty nasty
little beak in here that\'s
00:02:51.920 --> 00:02:56.850
like a little parrot beak,
so they can eat.
00:02:56.850 --> 00:03:00.530
I\'ve seen them come up and grab
seagulls off the surface.
00:03:00.530 --> 00:03:03.170
Grabbing onto their toes and
ripping their toes off trying
00:03:03.170 --> 00:03:04.270
to eat them.
00:03:04.270 --> 00:03:05.520
It\'s unbelievable.
00:03:05.520 --> 00:03:09.530
00:03:09.530 --> 00:03:13.150
On board the W.E. Ricker,
scientists are racing to
00:03:13.150 --> 00:03:15.680
assess the impact this
squid is having
00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:16.930
on the local fishery.
00:03:16.930 --> 00:03:19.730
00:03:19.730 --> 00:03:23.220
Right now, they\'re trolling
for hake, part of a survey
00:03:23.220 --> 00:03:26.350
that sets next year\'s quota
for one of the biggest
00:03:26.350 --> 00:03:29.424
fisheries on the west coast.
00:03:29.424 --> 00:03:33.620
But this year, they\'re netting
fewer hake, and a lot more
00:03:33.620 --> 00:03:34.895
predatory squid.
00:03:34.895 --> 00:03:39.510
00:03:39.510 --> 00:03:46.580
In 1998, I remember we caught,
I think, one jumbo squid.
00:03:46.580 --> 00:03:50.760
In fact, I didn\'t know
what it was.
00:03:50.760 --> 00:03:55.500
In 2007, we end up with 80.
00:03:55.500 --> 00:04:02.820
In this year, 2009, we have been
following squid in a very
00:04:02.820 --> 00:04:07.500
identifiable layer from the
Canadian US border, right on
00:04:07.500 --> 00:04:13.055
up to Queen Charlotte Sound,
where we are now.
00:04:13.055 --> 00:04:16.519
And they know that because this
year, they\'re not just
00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:18.500
counting hake.
00:04:18.500 --> 00:04:23.760
For the first time, they\'re
also surveying the squid.
00:04:23.760 --> 00:04:27.830
Using acoustical instruments to
identify its location, they
00:04:27.830 --> 00:04:31.490
confirm what they\'re seeing at
night by jigging, because
00:04:31.490 --> 00:04:34.450
that\'s when the squid feeds
near the surface.
00:04:34.450 --> 00:04:37.220
As the night gets darker, you
get to two in the morning,
00:04:37.220 --> 00:04:39.410
everything\'s moved up
the water column.
00:04:39.410 --> 00:04:41.910
The hand jigs are only working
the top 10 or 20 meters.
00:04:41.910 --> 00:04:44.540
The squid are right up
near the surface.
00:04:44.540 --> 00:04:46.610
When they\'re brought in on the
jigs, you can see other squid
00:04:46.610 --> 00:04:47.910
chasing them up as well.
00:04:47.910 --> 00:04:51.295
00:04:51.295 --> 00:04:53.810
When we were doing the acoustic
work we saw a large
00:04:53.810 --> 00:04:57.150
layer, and that layer
went on for miles.
00:04:57.150 --> 00:04:59.920
If you have a school or a
population that\'s spread over
00:04:59.920 --> 00:05:02.050
that kind of an area, you
would be talking about
00:05:02.050 --> 00:05:03.300
millions of squid.
00:05:03.300 --> 00:05:05.330
00:05:05.330 --> 00:05:11.330
And that\'s a lot of hungry squid
eating a lot of fish.
00:05:11.330 --> 00:05:15.460
In a life span of just one or
two years, the Humboldt can
00:05:15.460 --> 00:05:19.980
grow into a two meter long,
45 kilogram predator.
00:05:19.980 --> 00:05:24.785
To get that big that fast,
it\'s constantly feeding.
00:05:24.785 --> 00:05:27.070
And it doesn\'t eat alone.
00:05:27.070 --> 00:05:30.670
This squid hunts in packs
and feeds on whatever is
00:05:30.670 --> 00:05:35.430
available, from krill and
hake to its own kind.
00:05:35.430 --> 00:05:38.290
00:05:38.290 --> 00:05:41.560
But this year, the squid
isn\'t just eating hake.
00:05:41.560 --> 00:05:44.860
It\'s changing its behavior.
00:05:44.860 --> 00:05:47.620
There is a change in the
distribution pattern of hake.
00:05:47.620 --> 00:05:51.200
They\'re down deeper, they\'re
more dispersed.
00:05:51.200 --> 00:05:53.690
We haven\'t seen the abundance
that might be
00:05:53.690 --> 00:05:56.740
expected in our waters.
00:05:56.740 --> 00:05:59.350
I\'m pretty sure I\'m seeing
some change in schooling
00:05:59.350 --> 00:06:02.910
behavior as a result
of the squid.
00:06:02.910 --> 00:06:05.340
And that\'s not the only
change Ken and his
00:06:05.340 --> 00:06:07.500
colleagues have seen.
00:06:07.500 --> 00:06:10.950
A fish that traditionally spawns
off California, the
00:06:10.950 --> 00:06:14.550
hake now seems to be breeding
up here, because the team is
00:06:14.550 --> 00:06:16.610
catching a lot more juveniles.
00:06:16.610 --> 00:06:19.520
And that could pose a serious
threat in the future.
00:06:19.520 --> 00:06:22.640
00:06:22.640 --> 00:06:25.140
Sure, they\'re spawning off
of our waters, but
00:06:25.140 --> 00:06:26.800
are the young surviving?
00:06:26.800 --> 00:06:30.660
They may not have the same sort
of environment to survive
00:06:30.660 --> 00:06:34.250
in as a young fish as they did
in California [? Bay ?]
00:06:34.250 --> 00:06:35.490
for instance.
00:06:35.490 --> 00:06:36.740
So, that\'s a threat.
00:06:36.740 --> 00:06:39.240
00:06:39.240 --> 00:06:42.090
So what\'s pushing the
hake and Humboldt
00:06:42.090 --> 00:06:45.360
further and further north?
00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:50.050
Some 2,000 kilometers south in
Monterey Bay, California, deep
00:06:50.050 --> 00:06:53.920
sea pioneer Bruce Robison
witnessed phase one of the
00:06:53.920 --> 00:06:55.405
Humboldt northward migration.
00:06:55.405 --> 00:06:58.110
00:06:58.110 --> 00:07:03.020
On a day like this in 1998, he
and his team lowered their
00:07:03.020 --> 00:07:07.580
camera mounted ROV
into the ocean.
00:07:07.580 --> 00:07:10.640
When they get to the control
room and switch on the camera,
00:07:10.640 --> 00:07:12.472
they see this.
00:07:12.472 --> 00:07:13.820
The Humboldt squid.
00:07:13.820 --> 00:07:18.220
If we can get more of a look at
that, that would be great.
00:07:18.220 --> 00:07:21.570
Robison has been conducting
underwater surveys since the
00:07:21.570 --> 00:07:28.510
mid 1980s, and he\'s never seen
this particular squid before.
00:07:28.510 --> 00:07:31.760
And is there a statistical test
you can run on that to
00:07:31.760 --> 00:07:34.930
show it\'s not a fluke?
00:07:34.930 --> 00:07:39.090
Over the next few years, Robison
searches for clues to
00:07:39.090 --> 00:07:40.655
explain the sudden invasion.
00:07:40.655 --> 00:07:46.810
00:07:46.810 --> 00:07:50.850
Lack of predation may be
part of the problem.
00:07:50.850 --> 00:07:55.710
Big predators have been fished
out in the squid\'s home range.
00:07:55.710 --> 00:08:00.050
Recent estimates suggest that
90% of the big fishes, the
00:08:00.050 --> 00:08:04.240
tunas, the billfishes,
have been fished out.
00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:07.430
Those big fishes eat
the baby squid.
00:08:07.430 --> 00:08:10.890
In response to that, in the
home range, the squid
00:08:10.890 --> 00:08:15.170
population grew, and grew,
and grew, and grew.
00:08:15.170 --> 00:08:19.520
But an exploding population
doesn\'t tell the whole story.
00:08:19.520 --> 00:08:21.660
So Robison looks back
at the records.
00:08:21.660 --> 00:08:25.820
00:08:25.820 --> 00:08:30.715
Fishermen have seen this squid
before during warmer periods.
00:08:30.715 --> 00:08:33.887
And the year Robison spots
them is one of
00:08:33.887 --> 00:08:35.137
the warmest on record.
00:08:35.137 --> 00:08:38.670
00:08:38.670 --> 00:08:43.510
We saw no evidence of Humboldt
squid until the
00:08:43.510 --> 00:08:47.700
1997, 1998 El Nino.
00:08:47.700 --> 00:08:51.990
And when that slug of warm water
moved into Monterey Bay,
00:08:51.990 --> 00:08:54.910
Humboldt squid came with it.
00:08:54.910 --> 00:08:57.250
The numbers of hake had dropped
off significantly
00:08:57.250 --> 00:08:59.600
while they were here.
00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:03.640
And then in 2002, there
was a little El Nino.
00:09:03.640 --> 00:09:09.050
But the squid came back, and
they\'ve been here ever since.
00:09:09.050 --> 00:09:14.150
I think that episodic range
expansions during El Nino
00:09:14.150 --> 00:09:17.460
periods were a natural
process.
00:09:17.460 --> 00:09:21.560
But the fact that that door has
been forced open and now
00:09:21.560 --> 00:09:24.870
stays open, is our
responsibility.
00:09:24.870 --> 00:09:27.910
00:09:27.910 --> 00:09:31.580
And it\'s our responsibility
because of this.
00:09:31.580 --> 00:09:35.000
Thanks to a blanket of carbon
dioxide produced by the
00:09:35.000 --> 00:09:38.690
burning of fossil fuels, the
planet\'s warmest climate
00:09:38.690 --> 00:09:43.300
cycle, El Nino, may be getting
more persistent.
00:09:43.300 --> 00:09:46.770
That cycle originates in the
tropics, but it seems to be
00:09:46.770 --> 00:09:50.710
driving up ocean temperatures
in many other regions of the
00:09:50.710 --> 00:09:52.740
global sea.
00:09:52.740 --> 00:09:56.480
Climate change certainly
contributes to the fact that
00:09:56.480 --> 00:09:58.500
the Humboldt squid
are moving north.
00:09:58.500 --> 00:10:00.810
In the northern hemisphere
in south, in the southern
00:10:00.810 --> 00:10:01.610
hemisphere.
00:10:01.610 --> 00:10:07.130
We\'re making the waters that
they are now inhabiting much
00:10:07.130 --> 00:10:10.510
more welcoming to the squid.
00:10:10.510 --> 00:10:14.670
And it\'s highly likely that
a lot of other species are
00:10:14.670 --> 00:10:16.690
undergoing the same
kind of process.
00:10:16.690 --> 00:10:19.355
00:10:19.355 --> 00:10:23.920
And that process may
be well under way.
00:10:23.920 --> 00:10:27.600
According to recent estimates,
the world\'s fish stocks are
00:10:27.600 --> 00:10:30.930
swimming poleward at
a rate of 40 to 60
00:10:30.930 --> 00:10:32.765
kilometers per decade.
00:10:32.765 --> 00:10:35.790
00:10:35.790 --> 00:10:38.580
Some places might be so
perturbed by these new species
00:10:38.580 --> 00:10:40.630
coming in that they can\'t
function the way they used to
00:10:40.630 --> 00:10:41.990
be, and functionally collapse.
00:10:41.990 --> 00:10:44.850
Others may be just fine.
00:10:44.850 --> 00:10:46.910
That\'s something that people
are all over the world
00:10:46.910 --> 00:10:48.590
scrambling to find out.
00:10:48.590 --> 00:10:52.050
Because we have this window of
time to try to estimate which
00:10:52.050 --> 00:10:56.720
ecosystems are more at risk,
and then how the climate is
00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:57.970
going to affect that.
00:10:57.970 --> 00:11:02.390
00:11:02.390 --> 00:11:06.810
But invading species aren\'t
the only threat.
00:11:06.810 --> 00:11:10.590
Scientists like Steve Palumbi
are equally concerned about
00:11:10.590 --> 00:11:14.190
plants and animals
that can\'t move.
00:11:14.190 --> 00:11:17.480
Many are sensitive to
temperature, and some form the
00:11:17.480 --> 00:11:19.910
foundation of entire
ecosystems.
00:11:19.910 --> 00:11:26.230
00:11:26.230 --> 00:11:29.930
Here in Monterey Bay, kelp
forests are the primary
00:11:29.930 --> 00:11:33.780
coastal ecosystem, life support
for thousands of
00:11:33.780 --> 00:11:37.355
creatures that live above
the water and below it.
00:11:37.355 --> 00:11:40.090
00:11:40.090 --> 00:11:44.200
A favorite dive location for the
resident sea otter and for
00:11:44.200 --> 00:11:47.854
biologist, Steve Palumbi.
00:11:47.854 --> 00:11:48.846
Clear?
00:11:48.846 --> 00:11:50.096
Clear.
00:11:50.096 --> 00:11:58.000
00:11:58.000 --> 00:12:02.900
Peaceful, majestic, and teeming
with life, kelp
00:12:02.900 --> 00:12:05.210
forests are found
in cool, coastal
00:12:05.210 --> 00:12:07.540
waters around the world.
00:12:07.540 --> 00:12:10.530
And they\'re among the most
productive and dynamic
00:12:10.530 --> 00:12:12.170
ecosystems on the planet.
00:12:12.170 --> 00:12:14.890
00:12:14.890 --> 00:12:20.170
The productivity of it churns
out a whole set of species, of
00:12:20.170 --> 00:12:21.390
fish invertebrates.
00:12:21.390 --> 00:12:24.900
Not only feed on the water and
the plankton in it, but they
00:12:24.900 --> 00:12:29.280
also feed on the kelp, and they
feed on the nutrients
00:12:29.280 --> 00:12:31.900
that the kelp dumps back
into the water itself.
00:12:31.900 --> 00:12:38.136
00:12:38.136 --> 00:12:41.040
But giant kelp does
best in water
00:12:41.040 --> 00:12:44.280
temperatures of 10 to 18 degrees.
00:12:44.280 --> 00:12:47.280
So if temperature continues
to climb, this
00:12:47.280 --> 00:12:49.160
ecosystem will be at risk.
00:12:49.160 --> 00:12:52.340
00:12:52.340 --> 00:12:57.640
Every ecosystem, kelp forests,
sea grass beds, oyster reefs,
00:12:57.640 --> 00:13:00.770
coral reefs, they all are
feeling the brunt
00:13:00.770 --> 00:13:02.540
of this same problem.
00:13:02.540 --> 00:13:06.230
00:13:06.230 --> 00:13:08.960
But heat isn\'t the only problem
they\'re facing.
00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:12.950
00:13:12.950 --> 00:13:19.060
In 2006, in the deep ocean off
Oregon, thousands of creatures
00:13:19.060 --> 00:13:23.300
suddenly disappeared, and
scientists raced out to sea to
00:13:23.300 --> 00:13:24.550
find out why.
00:13:24.550 --> 00:13:32.730
00:13:32.730 --> 00:13:37.466
The Pacific Ocean just off
Cape Perpetua, Oregon.
00:13:37.466 --> 00:13:41.970
A bountiful ecosystem that\'s
produced enough fish and crabs
00:13:41.970 --> 00:13:43.873
to support generations
of fisherman.
00:13:43.873 --> 00:13:47.490
00:13:47.490 --> 00:13:53.000
But in 2002, a strange mystery
begins to unfold here.
00:13:53.000 --> 00:13:55.890
Fisherman send out
alarming reports.
00:13:55.890 --> 00:14:00.970
Dead or dying dungeness crabs
coming up in their traps.
00:14:00.970 --> 00:14:05.170
Others, like Al [? Pizarre ?],
witness even stranger events.
00:14:05.170 --> 00:14:08.020
00:14:08.020 --> 00:14:13.410
The crabs ran offshore, inshore
to the surf line or to
00:14:13.410 --> 00:14:15.500
the north out of the zone.
00:14:15.500 --> 00:14:18.310
As did the fish off the reefs,
some reefs down off Cape
00:14:18.310 --> 00:14:21.200
Perpetua, were found to
be vacant of fish.
00:14:21.200 --> 00:14:24.800
00:14:24.800 --> 00:14:27.880
And we immediately thought, as
did much of the public, that
00:14:27.880 --> 00:14:29.180
it was a toxin.
00:14:29.180 --> 00:14:31.750
Something in the water
was killing things.
00:14:31.750 --> 00:14:33.490
And we hurriedly looked
at the records.
00:14:33.490 --> 00:14:35.430
I had some from offshore.
00:14:35.430 --> 00:14:38.510
My colleagues had them from
right near shore.
00:14:38.510 --> 00:14:40.140
And we quickly compared
them and found
00:14:40.140 --> 00:14:41.390
that it was low oxygen.
00:14:41.390 --> 00:14:45.660
00:14:45.660 --> 00:14:48.260
We saw the unique occurrence.
00:14:48.260 --> 00:14:51.275
In the summertime, there\'s
usually an octopus spawn.
00:14:51.275 --> 00:14:55.330
And the little baby octopus,
inch and a half long, they
00:14:55.330 --> 00:14:57.740
were actually climbing
up our crab ropes.
00:14:57.740 --> 00:15:01.510
And we saw dozens of little
octopus in their attempt to
00:15:01.510 --> 00:15:04.900
escape the low oxygen
at the bottom, and
00:15:04.900 --> 00:15:06.150
getting up to the surface.
00:15:06.150 --> 00:15:08.750
00:15:08.750 --> 00:15:12.780
The strange events off Cape
Perpetua send ocean scientists
00:15:12.780 --> 00:15:17.780
Francis Chan and Jack Barth out
to sea to investigate why
00:15:17.780 --> 00:15:22.040
oxygen levels are dropping,
training their sensors on what
00:15:22.040 --> 00:15:25.280
will come to be known as
the Oregon Dead Zone.
00:15:25.280 --> 00:15:30.080
00:15:30.080 --> 00:15:33.090
Well, it was scary because the
question is, well, how big is
00:15:33.090 --> 00:15:36.910
this, and how long is
this going to last?
00:15:36.910 --> 00:15:39.390
We thought that that was just
a once in a lifetime event.
00:15:39.390 --> 00:15:42.960
But every year since then, we\'ve
been able to track this
00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:46.870
reappearance of low oxygen
water on a shelf.
00:15:46.870 --> 00:15:51.750
So what\'s causing the return
of the low oxygen zone?
00:15:51.750 --> 00:15:55.360
Barth and Chan immediately rule
out pollutants, because
00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:59.410
there are no major rivers
emptying into this coast.
00:15:59.410 --> 00:16:02.390
Which leaves just
one possibility.
00:16:02.390 --> 00:16:05.120
A change in the ocean itself.
00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:08.170
It\'s a alteration that
we\'re seeing.
00:16:08.170 --> 00:16:10.615
We kind of think of it
as an arrhythmia.
00:16:10.615 --> 00:16:14.750
So a change in the
natural rhythms.
00:16:14.750 --> 00:16:17.520
And the natural rhythms
here are set by a
00:16:17.520 --> 00:16:20.960
process called upwelling.
00:16:20.960 --> 00:16:24.550
During the summer, powerful
winds from the north drive the
00:16:24.550 --> 00:16:27.615
nutrient-rich waters of the
deep up to the surface.
00:16:27.615 --> 00:16:31.250
00:16:31.250 --> 00:16:35.630
Those nutrients feed life forms
like this, millions of
00:16:35.630 --> 00:16:38.130
microscopic plants called
phytoplankton.
00:16:38.130 --> 00:16:49.340
00:16:49.340 --> 00:16:53.340
Food for countless creatures,
this astonishing floating
00:16:53.340 --> 00:16:56.070
forest fuels one of
the most valuable
00:16:56.070 --> 00:16:59.090
ecosystems on the planet.
00:16:59.090 --> 00:17:01.170
Though we\'re actually really
lucky to be working in such a
00:17:01.170 --> 00:17:04.410
productive ecosystem, because
there aren\'t that many places
00:17:04.410 --> 00:17:06.819
is the world\'s ocean
that\'s like this.
00:17:06.819 --> 00:17:09.250
And these upwelling ecosystems,
they\'re really
00:17:09.250 --> 00:17:12.900
small in area, maybe 1% of the
world\'s ocean, but they\'re
00:17:12.900 --> 00:17:17.770
responsible for nearly 25%
of the wild fish catches.
00:17:17.770 --> 00:17:21.200
So we\'re seeing this amazing
community of rockfish.
00:17:21.200 --> 00:17:23.720
There\'s a lot of different
species down here.
00:17:23.720 --> 00:17:27.740
Supporting some of these fishes
are this amazingly rich
00:17:27.740 --> 00:17:30.140
community of marine
vertebrate.
00:17:30.140 --> 00:17:34.870
And this is what a healthy and
productive ecosystem can look
00:17:34.870 --> 00:17:37.790
like off the Oregon coast.
00:17:37.790 --> 00:17:40.510
And it\'s phytoplankton
that help support
00:17:40.510 --> 00:17:42.810
this amazing ecosystem.
00:17:42.810 --> 00:17:48.370
But too much plankton can be
too much of a good thing.
00:17:48.370 --> 00:17:53.330
In 2006, unusually large
phytoplankton blooms begin to
00:17:53.330 --> 00:17:56.410
form off the Oregon coast.
00:17:56.410 --> 00:18:00.670
The blooms go on for weeks,
and a deadly process spins
00:18:00.670 --> 00:18:01.920
into motion.
00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:07.600
00:18:07.600 --> 00:18:12.450
Dead phytoplankton rains into
the depths as marine snow,
00:18:12.450 --> 00:18:16.460
where it\'s consumed by bacteria
that burns up oxygen
00:18:16.460 --> 00:18:19.100
at a furious rate.
00:18:19.100 --> 00:18:24.520
For the first time, levels
bottom out to zero, and 3,000
00:18:24.520 --> 00:18:28.490
square kilometers of ocean
become an oxygen-starved
00:18:28.490 --> 00:18:29.740
killing zone.
00:18:29.740 --> 00:18:35.635
00:18:35.635 --> 00:18:39.120
We saw no fish during this
period, because all of the
00:18:39.120 --> 00:18:42.460
fish either died, or they just
fled and tried to move, find
00:18:42.460 --> 00:18:45.050
waters that are richer
in oxygen.
00:18:45.050 --> 00:18:48.790
This was a beautiful Pycnopodia
star, literally
00:18:48.790 --> 00:18:51.070
degrading and disintegrating
and rotting in
00:18:51.070 --> 00:18:52.320
front of our eyes.
00:18:52.320 --> 00:18:58.200
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:02.480
Only a major disruption in the
upwelling cycle could cause
00:19:02.480 --> 00:19:05.090
such a devastating
loss of life.
00:19:05.090 --> 00:19:10.700
And by 2006, Barth and Chan
suspect that climate change is
00:19:10.700 --> 00:19:11.810
the main culprit.
00:19:11.810 --> 00:19:14.310
Way off the corner there,
[? Mate ?].
00:19:14.310 --> 00:19:16.810
Grab the other boat hook.
00:19:16.810 --> 00:19:20.940
Global warming seems to be
driving stronger winds, and
00:19:20.940 --> 00:19:23.070
stronger winds are
super charging
00:19:23.070 --> 00:19:25.450
the upwelling process.
00:19:25.450 --> 00:19:28.810
But there\'s another massive
change happening some 500
00:19:28.810 --> 00:19:33.740
kilometers north that may also
be driving down oxygen levels
00:19:33.740 --> 00:19:37.730
in the Oregon Dead Zone.
00:19:37.730 --> 00:19:41.930
Just off Canada, in the
subarctic Pacific, the deep
00:19:41.930 --> 00:19:46.570
ocean is undergoing a disturbing
transformation, one
00:19:46.570 --> 00:19:49.725
that Frank Whitney has been
monitoring for over a decade.
00:19:49.725 --> 00:19:53.290
00:19:53.290 --> 00:19:56.720
For more than 50 years, chemical
oceanographers like
00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:01.360
Whitney have journeyed across
the same 1,400 kilometers of
00:20:01.360 --> 00:20:05.440
subarctic sea, sampling seawater
and measuring its
00:20:05.440 --> 00:20:08.200
properties.
00:20:08.200 --> 00:20:13.000
And after surveying more than
five decades of oxygen data,
00:20:13.000 --> 00:20:15.720
Whitney makes a shocking
discovery.
00:20:15.720 --> 00:20:20.040
The deep ocean here is
also losing oxygen.
00:20:20.040 --> 00:20:22.195
There was a distinct
trend over time.
00:20:22.195 --> 00:20:28.850
A 22?cline in oxygen from
about 150 to 600 meters.
00:20:28.850 --> 00:20:31.580
It\'s a huge drop.
00:20:31.580 --> 00:20:35.170
My evidence from deep ocean
suggested that a good part of
00:20:35.170 --> 00:20:36.760
the story was due
to the reduced
00:20:36.760 --> 00:20:38.720
ventilation of the ocean.
00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:42.640
And ventilation is the main
way the ocean breathes.
00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:46.110
00:20:46.110 --> 00:20:51.650
Most oxygen is absorbed at the
surface of the subpolar seas.
00:20:51.650 --> 00:20:54.950
Winter storms cool the surface
water, making it
00:20:54.950 --> 00:20:58.300
heavy enough to sink.
00:20:58.300 --> 00:21:02.220
Like a deep breath, that sinking
water transports
00:21:02.220 --> 00:21:03.665
oxygen into the depths.
00:21:03.665 --> 00:21:06.270
00:21:06.270 --> 00:21:11.075
But as the planet heats up and
glaciers melt, ocean breathing
00:21:11.075 --> 00:21:13.900
is slowing down.
00:21:13.900 --> 00:21:17.940
Flooded with fresh water, the
surface layer is too light to
00:21:17.940 --> 00:21:20.720
sink, and that\'s cutting
off the oxygen
00:21:20.720 --> 00:21:22.495
supply in the deep ocean.
00:21:22.495 --> 00:21:27.190
00:21:27.190 --> 00:21:31.180
A gentle slope towards oxygen
loss, even down at 800 meters.
00:21:31.180 --> 00:21:34.450
It is very evident in the
subarctic Pacific, but it\'s
00:21:34.450 --> 00:21:37.820
also being picked up in the
North Atlantic where there is
00:21:37.820 --> 00:21:40.420
also a freshening of
the surface ocean.
00:21:40.420 --> 00:21:46.260
So if this problem really gets
rooted in the North Atlantic,
00:21:46.260 --> 00:21:47.810
then you\'re looking at something
that is going to
00:21:47.810 --> 00:21:50.870
carry through most of
the world\'s oceans.
00:21:50.870 --> 00:21:55.520
And if you look at the trouble
caused by just a 22?cline
00:21:55.520 --> 00:21:59.620
in oxygen, you get a sense
of the global threat.
00:21:59.620 --> 00:22:02.910
Especially to deep dwelling
ground fish like halibut,
00:22:02.910 --> 00:22:07.550
whose numbers here
are shrinking.
00:22:07.550 --> 00:22:11.120
It\'s scary, because a lot of
fish that are unable to
00:22:11.120 --> 00:22:14.420
tolerate low oxygen either get
crowded into a narrower
00:22:14.420 --> 00:22:17.110
habitat, or they\'re going to
be forced into northward
00:22:17.110 --> 00:22:21.410
migrations up into areas where
there is more oxygen.
00:22:21.410 --> 00:22:26.480
00:22:26.480 --> 00:22:29.380
But that\'s not Whitney\'s
only concern.
00:22:29.380 --> 00:22:34.180
As low oxygen or hypoxic zones
expand, it\'s not just fish
00:22:34.180 --> 00:22:37.250
that will suffer.
00:22:37.250 --> 00:22:41.210
When we think of hypoxic waters
becoming shallower
00:22:41.210 --> 00:22:44.460
along the BC coast, we have to
think about impacts to all the
00:22:44.460 --> 00:22:47.660
organisms that can\'t move
out of their habitat.
00:22:47.660 --> 00:22:50.990
And a lot of those organisms
are probably very important
00:22:50.990 --> 00:22:56.020
for just keeping the
ecosystem healthy.
00:22:56.020 --> 00:22:58.710
Sponges and corals on the
coast, some of them very
00:22:58.710 --> 00:23:00.790
unique to the BC coast.
00:23:00.790 --> 00:23:03.640
Hypoxia is going
to stress them.
00:23:03.640 --> 00:23:04.890
There\'s no question.
00:23:04.890 --> 00:23:09.530
00:23:09.530 --> 00:23:13.240
But it\'s not just subarctic
species that are at risk,
00:23:13.240 --> 00:23:17.000
because the low oxygen waters
here are carried all the way
00:23:17.000 --> 00:23:21.250
down this coast on the
California current, deep water
00:23:21.250 --> 00:23:24.850
that\'s fueling the Oregon Dead
Zone, and threatening the
00:23:24.850 --> 00:23:26.890
entire North American coast.
00:23:26.890 --> 00:23:30.170
00:23:30.170 --> 00:23:33.020
We have very precise
measurements over many, many
00:23:33.020 --> 00:23:37.890
years, and we can detect a trend
that is going to lower
00:23:37.890 --> 00:23:38.720
and lower oxygen.
00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:43.400
And it\'s the same trend from
Vancouver, British Columbia,
00:23:43.400 --> 00:23:46.940
down through Oregon, down
through Monterey Bay, down
00:23:46.940 --> 00:23:48.570
into Southern California,
and even
00:23:48.570 --> 00:23:52.060
connecting down to the equator.
00:23:52.060 --> 00:23:56.080
So I think you can call it a
global phenomena that we\'ve
00:23:56.080 --> 00:23:58.830
got to keep our eyes on.
00:23:58.830 --> 00:24:02.860
And it truly is a
global problem.
00:24:02.860 --> 00:24:07.410
On the South African and South
American coasts, dead zones,
00:24:07.410 --> 00:24:10.360
like the one in Oregon,
are getting worse.
00:24:10.360 --> 00:24:13.570
And low oxygen zones
are expanding in
00:24:13.570 --> 00:24:14.820
the tropical seas.
00:24:14.820 --> 00:24:17.210
00:24:17.210 --> 00:24:21.810
And if oxygen levels continue to
drop, millions of creatures
00:24:21.810 --> 00:24:23.900
will feel the impact.
00:24:23.900 --> 00:24:26.260
Some may adapt.
00:24:26.260 --> 00:24:27.626
Others won\'t.
00:24:27.626 --> 00:24:31.610
00:24:31.610 --> 00:24:36.480
But there\'s another disturbing
change occurring in the ocean.
00:24:36.480 --> 00:24:40.260
Its basic chemistry is changing,
and that could spell
00:24:40.260 --> 00:24:42.730
disaster for life in
the global sea.
00:24:42.730 --> 00:24:51.650
00:24:51.650 --> 00:24:56.290
Almost two trillion metric
tons of carbon dioxide.
00:24:56.290 --> 00:24:57.730
That\'s what we\'ve released
into the
00:24:57.730 --> 00:25:00.680
atmosphere in just 200 years.
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:06.480
And more than a quarter has been
absorbed by the ocean.
00:25:06.480 --> 00:25:10.340
As a result, seawater is
becoming more acidic.
00:25:10.340 --> 00:25:17.650
00:25:17.650 --> 00:25:21.580
Scientist Richard Feely and
Debbie Ianson have been
00:25:21.580 --> 00:25:25.860
tracking ocean acidification
on the North Pacific coast.
00:25:25.860 --> 00:25:30.110
They and other scientists
predict a massive upsurge by
00:25:30.110 --> 00:25:33.890
the end of this century, as
much as a 200% percent
00:25:33.890 --> 00:25:37.480
increase in ocean acidity.
00:25:37.480 --> 00:25:40.680
This is more than we have
seen over the last 20
00:25:40.680 --> 00:25:43.430
to 25 million years.
00:25:43.430 --> 00:25:47.290
About 22 million tons of carbon
dioxide, everyday, goes
00:25:47.290 --> 00:25:49.690
into the oceans.
00:25:49.690 --> 00:25:53.010
The impact of that uptake of
carbon dioxide in our ocean
00:25:53.010 --> 00:25:56.210
ecosystem is really quite
dramatic, and we\'re very
00:25:56.210 --> 00:25:57.460
concerned about that.
00:25:57.460 --> 00:25:59.670
00:25:59.670 --> 00:26:03.120
The ocean is the largest
reservoir of active carbon on
00:26:03.120 --> 00:26:04.530
the planet.
00:26:04.530 --> 00:26:07.080
It ultimately controls what
the atmospheric CO2
00:26:07.080 --> 00:26:09.740
concentration is.
00:26:09.740 --> 00:26:13.300
The carbon that\'s coming from
our cars, and factories, et
00:26:13.300 --> 00:26:16.050
cetera, that carbon enters
at the surface.
00:26:16.050 --> 00:26:20.830
And the organisms that we depend
upon, much of the light
00:26:20.830 --> 00:26:22.830
is in the surface, because
that\'s where the light is.
00:26:22.830 --> 00:26:26.460
00:26:26.460 --> 00:26:30.480
And once that carbon dioxide
gets into the ocean, it reacts
00:26:30.480 --> 00:26:34.420
with seawater, forming carbonic
acid and consuming
00:26:34.420 --> 00:26:36.150
carbonate ions.
00:26:36.150 --> 00:26:39.590
Double jeopardy for calcifying
creatures like these.
00:26:39.590 --> 00:26:44.160
00:26:44.160 --> 00:26:47.950
In the future, they won\'t have
enough calcium carbonate to
00:26:47.950 --> 00:26:49.580
build their shells.
00:26:49.580 --> 00:26:53.550
And too much carbonic acid may
dissolve the shells they
00:26:53.550 --> 00:26:54.800
already have.
00:26:54.800 --> 00:27:01.340
00:27:01.340 --> 00:27:05.420
And the same fate may be facing
the world\'s coral
00:27:05.420 --> 00:27:09.260
reefs, one of the largest
and most important ocean
00:27:09.260 --> 00:27:10.570
ecosystems in the world.
00:27:10.570 --> 00:27:17.960
00:27:17.960 --> 00:27:22.480
Millions of creatures depend on
these reefs for survival.
00:27:22.480 --> 00:27:25.860
So if they disappear,
many other species
00:27:25.860 --> 00:27:27.110
will vanish with them.
00:27:27.110 --> 00:27:29.740
00:27:29.740 --> 00:27:34.320
Biological oceanographer Chris
Langdon has been studying the
00:27:34.320 --> 00:27:38.810
impact of acidification on
corals for more than a decade.
00:27:38.810 --> 00:27:42.330
Today, he\'s heading out to dive
on a reef just off the
00:27:42.330 --> 00:27:43.580
Florida Keys.
00:27:43.580 --> 00:27:45.720
00:27:45.720 --> 00:27:48.160
I just look forward to getting
out of the office and getting
00:27:48.160 --> 00:27:49.495
out here on the reef.
00:27:49.495 --> 00:27:53.380
It just makes me very sad to
think that what I\'m seeing
00:27:53.380 --> 00:27:57.110
here today, my children and
grandchildren may not get to
00:27:57.110 --> 00:28:00.990
experience because of the rapid
decline of the positions
00:28:00.990 --> 00:28:02.240
of the reefs.
00:28:02.240 --> 00:28:07.560
00:28:07.560 --> 00:28:11.870
Pollution, disease,
global warming.
00:28:11.870 --> 00:28:15.800
From Florida to Australia,
almost 20% of the world\'s
00:28:15.800 --> 00:28:20.190
corals have already been
lost, thanks to us.
00:28:20.190 --> 00:28:23.293
And the rest may be claimed
by ocean acidification.
00:28:23.293 --> 00:28:27.766
00:28:27.766 --> 00:28:30.390
The organisms I\'m particularly
interested in are the hard
00:28:30.390 --> 00:28:34.650
corals that build a limestone
skeleton from dissolved
00:28:34.650 --> 00:28:37.550
calcium and carbonate ions
in the seawater.
00:28:37.550 --> 00:28:41.170
And as the oceans become more
acidic, the carbonate ion
00:28:41.170 --> 00:28:44.230
concentration declines, and
that\'s really why the corals
00:28:44.230 --> 00:28:45.480
are sensitive to it.
00:28:45.480 --> 00:28:51.480
00:28:51.480 --> 00:28:57.060
And Langdon\'s experiments show
just how sensitive they are.
00:28:57.060 --> 00:29:00.700
He\'s been studying different
hard corals, placing them in
00:29:00.700 --> 00:29:03.540
tanks at different
acidity levels.
00:29:03.540 --> 00:29:06.960
One normal, the other at levels
predicted for the end
00:29:06.960 --> 00:29:09.090
of this century.
00:29:09.090 --> 00:29:13.970
And his measurements tell
a distressing story.
00:29:13.970 --> 00:29:16.750
The corals all look healthy.
00:29:16.750 --> 00:29:22.820
But in high acidity, growth
rates plummet by 40 to 60%.
00:29:22.820 --> 00:29:26.540
And if levels climb even higher,
corals will stop
00:29:26.540 --> 00:29:31.490
growing altogether and
eventually erode away, perhaps
00:29:31.490 --> 00:29:34.000
never to be replaced.
00:29:34.000 --> 00:29:36.340
Because acidification
may affect
00:29:36.340 --> 00:29:39.550
their ability to reproduce.
00:29:39.550 --> 00:29:43.820
And reproduction is one of the
most miraculous cycles in a
00:29:43.820 --> 00:29:45.070
coral\'s life.
00:29:45.070 --> 00:29:51.000
00:29:51.000 --> 00:29:54.210
With their visual sensors timed
to the light of the
00:29:54.210 --> 00:29:58.870
moon, corals release
their spawn.
00:29:58.870 --> 00:30:03.190
They do it on the same night
at virtually the same time,
00:30:03.190 --> 00:30:06.585
and only when the water is just
at the right temperature.
00:30:06.585 --> 00:30:25.390
00:30:25.390 --> 00:30:29.540
They release their larvae during
new moons or full moons
00:30:29.540 --> 00:30:31.970
during just a few months
out of the year.
00:30:31.970 --> 00:30:35.440
Other colonies of the same
species remotely are doing the
00:30:35.440 --> 00:30:36.220
same thing.
00:30:36.220 --> 00:30:38.620
So there\'s an opportunity
for the eggs and
00:30:38.620 --> 00:30:39.800
sperm to come together.
00:30:39.800 --> 00:30:43.980
Because otherwise the ocean\'s
a very vast space.
00:30:43.980 --> 00:30:47.930
Given that vast space, it\'s
no surprise that juvenile
00:30:47.930 --> 00:30:52.570
survival rates may be
as low as 1 to 6%.
00:30:52.570 --> 00:30:56.400
And new research in Langdon\'s
lab suggests that numbers will
00:30:56.400 --> 00:30:59.775
plunge even further as acidity
levels increase.
00:30:59.775 --> 00:31:03.490
00:31:03.490 --> 00:31:06.540
If the replacement rate by
sexual reproduction doesn\'t
00:31:06.540 --> 00:31:09.730
keep up, then populations
are just doomed to
00:31:09.730 --> 00:31:10.980
decline over time.
00:31:10.980 --> 00:31:14.050
00:31:14.050 --> 00:31:18.350
And that could spell disaster
for countless species,
00:31:18.350 --> 00:31:19.600
including ours.
00:31:19.600 --> 00:31:25.730
00:31:25.730 --> 00:31:28.640
About a quarter of all the fish
life in the ocean spends
00:31:28.640 --> 00:31:33.410
some part of their life
cycle on a reef.
00:31:33.410 --> 00:31:35.870
A lot of people depend, for
quite a large share of their
00:31:35.870 --> 00:31:39.950
protein, on the fish they
catch on the reef.
00:31:39.950 --> 00:31:43.480
I hope people can understand
this, and realize that food
00:31:43.480 --> 00:31:45.650
just doesn\'t come
from a store.
00:31:45.650 --> 00:31:49.570
It comes from real live plants
and animals that need clean
00:31:49.570 --> 00:31:52.650
air, clean water to survive
just as we do.
00:31:52.650 --> 00:31:54.329
And we need to take
care of them.
00:31:54.329 --> 00:32:00.430
00:32:00.430 --> 00:32:03.670
And if we don\'t take care,
it won\'t just be
00:32:03.670 --> 00:32:05.680
coral reefs that suffer.
00:32:05.680 --> 00:32:09.300
Because acidification could
destroy some of the most
00:32:09.300 --> 00:32:11.820
important creatures
in the global sea.
00:32:11.820 --> 00:32:17.210
00:32:17.210 --> 00:32:21.170
They\'re called zooplankton, tiny
animals that sit at the
00:32:21.170 --> 00:32:22.815
heart of the ocean food web.
00:32:22.815 --> 00:32:25.680
00:32:25.680 --> 00:32:29.740
Some, like these delicate
snails, form shells.
00:32:29.740 --> 00:32:34.330
It\'s just one variety of
Terapod, a species eaten by so
00:32:34.330 --> 00:32:37.100
many other creatures, they\'re
called the potato
00:32:37.100 --> 00:32:38.350
chips of the sea.
00:32:38.350 --> 00:32:44.550
00:32:44.550 --> 00:32:49.140
And that\'s why plankton expert
Dave Mackos is so worried.
00:32:49.140 --> 00:32:53.070
If their shells dissolve, a
critical part of the food web
00:32:53.070 --> 00:32:54.830
dissolves with them.
00:32:54.830 --> 00:32:58.630
And here in the North Pacific,
surface waters are becoming
00:32:58.630 --> 00:32:59.910
more and more acidic.
00:32:59.910 --> 00:33:05.260
00:33:05.260 --> 00:33:07.460
The parts of the ocean that
they live in are becoming
00:33:07.460 --> 00:33:11.100
corrosive for their shells.
00:33:11.100 --> 00:33:14.940
The area and the fraction of
the year that the water is
00:33:14.940 --> 00:33:18.730
going to be corrosive, if we
keep dumping CO2 into the
00:33:18.730 --> 00:33:22.410
atmosphere and into the ocean,
the amount of available
00:33:22.410 --> 00:33:25.870
habitat for these things is
going to get smaller, and
00:33:25.870 --> 00:33:29.620
smaller, and smaller,
and smaller.
00:33:29.620 --> 00:33:32.670
For years, Mackos and his
colleagues have been
00:33:32.670 --> 00:33:36.750
conducting plankton tows off
the BC coast, monitoring
00:33:36.750 --> 00:33:38.670
various populations.
00:33:38.670 --> 00:33:42.560
And their findings suggest that
every aspect of climate
00:33:42.560 --> 00:33:46.890
change, from warming to
acidification, is hammering
00:33:46.890 --> 00:33:49.460
the Terapod population.
00:33:49.460 --> 00:33:53.680
In one of our longest time
series, it does look like the
00:33:53.680 --> 00:33:56.170
Terapods have declined.
00:33:56.170 --> 00:33:59.030
We are changing the temperature
of the world.
00:33:59.030 --> 00:34:01.880
We are changing the chemistry
of the ocean.
00:34:01.880 --> 00:34:07.380
So I think it\'s actually a bit
of a mistake to say, what is
00:34:07.380 --> 00:34:09.199
the one smoking gun?
00:34:09.199 --> 00:34:12.980
It\'s kind of like asking, if the
apocalypse is coming, are
00:34:12.980 --> 00:34:17.190
you worried about the war, the
famine, or the pestilence?
00:34:17.190 --> 00:34:18.230
Which one\'s going to kill you?
00:34:18.230 --> 00:34:20.949
Well, any one of them could.
00:34:20.949 --> 00:34:24.960
And together, their cumulative
effect is almost certainly far
00:34:24.960 --> 00:34:28.980
worse than their individual
effect.
00:34:28.980 --> 00:34:33.030
And Terapods aren\'t the only
creatures on the front line.
00:34:33.030 --> 00:34:35.880
00:34:35.880 --> 00:34:39.570
Other plankton species build
protective shells.
00:34:39.570 --> 00:34:43.440
And if they disappear, the
bottom of the food chain will
00:34:43.440 --> 00:34:44.690
take a major hit.
00:34:44.690 --> 00:34:51.179
00:34:51.179 --> 00:34:55.520
Certainly if we affect the base
of the food chain, that
00:34:55.520 --> 00:34:59.030
will have a dramatic impact on
the top of the food chain that
00:34:59.030 --> 00:35:00.300
we are concerned about.
00:35:00.300 --> 00:35:04.890
The fish, the mammals, the
birds, that we know and love.
00:35:04.890 --> 00:35:07.640
The whales are directly
dependent on the food
00:35:07.640 --> 00:35:10.478
resources from the base
of the food chain.
00:35:10.478 --> 00:35:16.110
00:35:16.110 --> 00:35:19.270
There was a mass extinction
55 million years ago.
00:35:19.270 --> 00:35:21.910
And the oceans became acidic.
00:35:21.910 --> 00:35:26.000
But the difference now is that
our experiment, we\'re burning
00:35:26.000 --> 00:35:27.900
carbon so rapidly.
00:35:27.900 --> 00:35:30.160
We\'re doing this at least
10 times faster than
00:35:30.160 --> 00:35:32.860
any time in the past.
00:35:32.860 --> 00:35:34.350
Maybe 30 times faster.
00:35:34.350 --> 00:35:35.600
That\'s what we estimate.
00:35:35.600 --> 00:35:38.900
00:35:38.900 --> 00:35:42.810
And the geological record shows
fairly clearly that in
00:35:42.810 --> 00:35:46.050
many cases, many of these
species, particularly the
00:35:46.050 --> 00:35:48.230
calcifying species and
the coral reef
00:35:48.230 --> 00:35:50.780
species, went extinct.
00:35:50.780 --> 00:35:53.970
And those ecosystems
had to re-evolve.
00:35:53.970 --> 00:35:57.370
Had to start over again and
re-evolve, taking anywhere
00:35:57.370 --> 00:36:00.390
from two to 10 million years
for that to occur.
00:36:00.390 --> 00:36:05.310
00:36:05.310 --> 00:36:08.930
The cause of those past
extinctions seems to have been
00:36:08.930 --> 00:36:12.890
massive volcanic eruptions that
filled the atmosphere,
00:36:12.890 --> 00:36:16.900
then the ocean, with
carbon dioxide.
00:36:16.900 --> 00:36:21.360
The future cause may be us.
00:36:21.360 --> 00:36:25.080
So is mass extinction
the inevitable fate
00:36:25.080 --> 00:36:27.930
of the global sea?
00:36:27.930 --> 00:36:32.110
The waters near an ancient
Mediterranean volcano may hold
00:36:32.110 --> 00:36:33.360
the answer.
00:36:33.360 --> 00:36:42.680
00:36:42.680 --> 00:36:46.820
It towers like a menacing giant
over the city of Naples
00:36:46.820 --> 00:36:49.530
and the Mediterranean Sea.
00:36:49.530 --> 00:36:54.140
Vesuvius is still an active
volcano, and its impact can be
00:36:54.140 --> 00:36:57.130
felt 30 kilometers away
in the waters off
00:36:57.130 --> 00:36:58.380
the island of Ischia.
00:36:58.380 --> 00:37:05.800
00:37:05.800 --> 00:37:10.140
Marine ecologist Jason Hall
Spencer has been studying the
00:37:10.140 --> 00:37:12.820
ocean just off the
Ischian coast.
00:37:12.820 --> 00:37:16.260
And what he\'s discovered
may be a microcosm
00:37:16.260 --> 00:37:19.040
of the future sea.
00:37:19.040 --> 00:37:24.600
Thanks to Vesuvius, this small
patch of ocean is saturated
00:37:24.600 --> 00:37:25.850
with carbon dioxide.
00:37:25.850 --> 00:37:29.330
00:37:29.330 --> 00:37:31.080
It\'s pretty amazing to
look at, actually.
00:37:31.080 --> 00:37:33.120
Because there\'s a load of
bubbles bubbling up from the
00:37:33.120 --> 00:37:34.630
sea bed with the
carbon dioxide.
00:37:34.630 --> 00:37:36.590
And the reason that\'s happening
is that chalk is
00:37:36.590 --> 00:37:40.350
being boiled by the volcano of
Vesuvius, the famous volcano.
00:37:40.350 --> 00:37:42.460
It\'s driving this chalk up and
it\'s coming up at normal
00:37:42.460 --> 00:37:43.175
temperature.
00:37:43.175 --> 00:37:45.490
But it\'s acidifying the water
around it, just like we\'re
00:37:45.490 --> 00:37:48.610
doing to the planet worldwide
with increasing CO2.
00:37:48.610 --> 00:37:50.260
And this is a way of looking
into the future of the
00:37:50.260 --> 00:37:51.200
planet\'s ecosystems.
00:37:51.200 --> 00:37:53.540
Because naturally, this
area has been
00:37:53.540 --> 00:37:56.130
acidified for millennia.
00:37:56.130 --> 00:37:59.890
Today, Hall Spencer and his
colleagues are heading out to
00:37:59.890 --> 00:38:03.870
the CO2 vents to collect
specimens and check on an
00:38:03.870 --> 00:38:08.170
experiment being conducted by
sea grass expert, Maria
00:38:08.170 --> 00:38:12.950
Cristina Buia It\'s just one of
many studies they\'ve done
00:38:12.950 --> 00:38:16.890
assessing the impact of carbon
dioxide on everything from
00:38:16.890 --> 00:38:20.600
plankton and shellfish to
corals and urchins.
00:38:20.600 --> 00:38:24.040
I think we know anyway that the
CO2 increases the growth
00:38:24.040 --> 00:38:24.710
of the sea grass.
00:38:24.710 --> 00:38:28.970
But we want to know how the
knock-on affects the other
00:38:28.970 --> 00:38:30.220
marine life.
00:38:30.220 --> 00:38:41.580
00:38:41.580 --> 00:38:42.830
Go.
00:38:42.830 --> 00:38:48.520
00:38:48.520 --> 00:38:52.720
At first glance, it looks like
a lush green environment.
00:38:52.720 --> 00:38:55.130
But look a little closer,
and another
00:38:55.130 --> 00:38:57.650
picture begins to emerge.
00:38:57.650 --> 00:39:02.240
Because of the CO2 bubbling into
these sea grass beds, the
00:39:02.240 --> 00:39:06.220
acidity level here is close to
that predicted for the end of
00:39:06.220 --> 00:39:08.540
the century.
00:39:08.540 --> 00:39:12.620
Sea grass loves this
environment, because all that
00:39:12.620 --> 00:39:15.200
CO2 acts like a fertilizer.
00:39:15.200 --> 00:39:20.390
But Hall Spencer has conducted
detailed animal surveys here,
00:39:20.390 --> 00:39:23.240
and the results are troubling.
00:39:23.240 --> 00:39:25.810
We\'ve actually counted every
single organism we can find.
00:39:25.810 --> 00:39:28.350
And we found that\'s there\'s a
30% reduction, a crash in the
00:39:28.350 --> 00:39:30.010
biodiversity of the area.
00:39:30.010 --> 00:39:32.720
All the things that should be
there, reproducing and growing
00:39:32.720 --> 00:39:34.010
well, have gone.
00:39:34.010 --> 00:39:37.940
And it\'s like comparing a
desert to a rainforest.
00:39:37.940 --> 00:39:41.073
And the shelled creatures that
do make their way into the
00:39:41.073 --> 00:39:43.030
vents don\'t last long.
00:39:43.030 --> 00:39:46.325
00:39:46.325 --> 00:39:50.285
[SPEAKING FOREIGN LANGUAGE]
00:39:50.285 --> 00:39:52.770
Thanks.
00:39:52.770 --> 00:39:55.080
I tried to collect
these intact.
00:39:55.080 --> 00:39:57.910
Normally with a limpet, you
can get the whole animal.
00:39:57.910 --> 00:39:58.610
Yeah.
00:39:58.610 --> 00:39:59.750
It\'s easy.
00:39:59.750 --> 00:40:01.830
But these, they\'re so thin.
00:40:01.830 --> 00:40:02.610
They\'re just--
00:40:02.610 --> 00:40:03.300
[INAUDIBLE] broke, yeah.
00:40:03.300 --> 00:40:04.350
Yeah, they\'re just breaking
in my hands.
00:40:04.350 --> 00:40:05.255
They just open up.
00:40:05.255 --> 00:40:05.630
You know?
00:40:05.630 --> 00:40:07.450
That\'s [INAUDIBLE].
00:40:07.450 --> 00:40:08.800
Yes.
00:40:08.800 --> 00:40:10.490
They have recruited into the
[? cycling because there\'s ?]
00:40:10.490 --> 00:40:12.640
lots of food.
00:40:12.640 --> 00:40:15.380
Fertilized by this here too,
but it\'s their graveyard.
00:40:15.380 --> 00:40:16.200
They just dissolve.
00:40:16.200 --> 00:40:17.484
They don\'t resist.
00:40:17.484 --> 00:40:19.180
No.
00:40:19.180 --> 00:40:21.760
But strangely enough,
there are still
00:40:21.760 --> 00:40:25.090
fish in these waters.
00:40:25.090 --> 00:40:27.290
Certainly when you see these
sites with fish swimming
00:40:27.290 --> 00:40:29.730
around through the CO2 bubbles,
then maybe the whole
00:40:29.730 --> 00:40:31.530
fishing industry will breathe
a huge sigh of relief.
00:40:31.530 --> 00:40:34.005
Go, OK, there\'s plenty of
fish in the future.
00:40:34.005 --> 00:40:36.540
It doesn\'t matter how much CO2
you pump into the sea.
00:40:36.540 --> 00:40:38.060
Unfortunately, that\'s
a false view.
00:40:38.060 --> 00:40:41.000
What\'s happening is the fish are
able to swim in and out of
00:40:41.000 --> 00:40:43.980
this very high CO2 area that
we\'ve got here, but they
00:40:43.980 --> 00:40:45.480
cannot reproduce there.
00:40:45.480 --> 00:40:48.540
And some experiments that are
going on at my laboratory show
00:40:48.540 --> 00:40:51.620
that the very early life history
stages of fish are
00:40:51.620 --> 00:40:52.580
vulnerable in their
00:40:52.580 --> 00:40:54.140
development to high CO2 levels.
00:40:54.140 --> 00:40:59.610
00:40:59.610 --> 00:41:02.610
While I\'m saying I don\'t know
what the future is, what I can
00:41:02.610 --> 00:41:05.000
do is say that the sites
we\'re studying, it
00:41:05.000 --> 00:41:05.680
doesn\'t look good.
00:41:05.680 --> 00:41:08.590
And if we carry on doing what
we\'re doing, it looks bad.
00:41:08.590 --> 00:41:10.660
Because, for example,
corals have gone.
00:41:10.660 --> 00:41:14.570
For example, all of the
calcified organisms have gone.
00:41:14.570 --> 00:41:16.820
And that\'s bound to affect the
whole food chain, right up to
00:41:16.820 --> 00:41:18.070
fish and mankind.
00:41:18.070 --> 00:41:22.430
00:41:22.430 --> 00:41:26.630
And if that chain of life
unravels, then the nurturing
00:41:26.630 --> 00:41:31.550
sea, the one that gave us life,
will change beyond all
00:41:31.550 --> 00:41:32.800
recognition.
00:41:32.800 --> 00:41:47.980
00:41:47.980 --> 00:41:51.940
Previously, the oceans were able
to adjust and buffer the
00:41:51.940 --> 00:41:55.320
effects of high CO2, so the
pH didn\'t alter so much.
00:41:55.320 --> 00:41:58.210
But now, we\'re ramping it up
so quickly that it cannot
00:41:58.210 --> 00:42:00.270
adjust in time.
00:42:00.270 --> 00:42:03.680
So if we can just for goodness
sake, reduce the amount of CO2
00:42:03.680 --> 00:42:06.740
and the amount of energy we
consume, then that\'s going to
00:42:06.740 --> 00:42:08.740
benefit the oceans worldwide.
00:42:08.740 --> 00:42:13.120
00:42:13.120 --> 00:42:17.520
The decisions that we make in
our generation over the next
00:42:17.520 --> 00:42:22.300
20 to 30 years, will impact
hundreds of generations of
00:42:22.300 --> 00:42:25.610
mankind in the future.
00:42:25.610 --> 00:42:27.340
So we better get this right.
00:42:27.340 --> 00:42:30.250
And we better get this
right right now.
00:42:30.250 --> 00:42:32.180
I\'m a father and
a grandfather.
00:42:32.180 --> 00:42:43.255
And I\'m very concerned that we
leave this for them in a state
00:42:43.255 --> 00:42:48.960
that they can appreciate,
that they can utilize.
00:42:48.960 --> 00:42:52.275
Not one where they look back
and say, this generation
00:42:52.275 --> 00:42:53.564
didn\'t do its job.
00:42:53.564 --> 00:42:57.080
00:42:57.080 --> 00:43:00.860
So how will our generation
be remembered?
00:43:00.860 --> 00:43:04.950
Perhaps as one that formed a new
partnership with the ocean
00:43:04.950 --> 00:43:07.640
and its astonishing creatures.
00:43:07.640 --> 00:43:12.480
If not, then it may be us and
thousands of other species
00:43:12.480 --> 00:43:16.660
that pay the ultimate price.
00:43:16.660 --> 00:43:21.470
The ocean will endure with or
without us, source waters of
00:43:21.470 --> 00:43:24.395
the planet, and the cradle
of new life.
00:43:24.395 --> 00:44:01.920
Distributor: Bullfrog Films
Length: 44 minutes
Date: 2012
Genre: Expository
Language: English
Grade: 8-12, College, Adult
Color/BW:
Closed Captioning: Available
Audio description: Available
Interactive Transcript: Available
Existing customers, please log in to view this film.
New to Docuseek? Register to request a quote.